I Flipping the sign in the definition of derivative

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
Is it true that if ##f## is differentiable at ##a## that ##f'(a) = \lim_{h\to a}\frac{f(a+h) - f(a)}{h} = \lim_{h\to a}\frac{f(a-h) - f(a)}{-h}##. That is, can the sign of ##h## be flipped. I've seen this a few times and it seems a bit dubious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you mean h --> 0. and there is no difference between these two definitions, just changing the name of the variable from h to -h. to convince yourself use the trick for teaching algebra that uses an empty box instead of a variable, i.e. limit as ( )-->0, of f( a + ( ))/( ). and any letter you put in the box means the same thing, whether you call it h or s or -h or anything else. Well to be honest this is true because h-->0 if and only if -h -->0.
 
  • Like
Likes Mr Davis 97
Differentiability means that we get the same derivative regardless whether we approach from the left or from the right.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Is it true that if ##f## is differentiable at ##a## that ##f'(a) = \lim_{h\to a}\frac{f(a+h) - f(a)}{h} = \lim_{h\to a}\frac{f(a-h) - f(a)}{-h}##. That is, can the sign of ##h## be flipped. I've seen this a few times and it seems a bit dubious.

If in doubt, ##\epsilon-\delta## is your best friend. Why don't you just try that?
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top