Flow line vs equipotential line

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between flow lines and equipotential lines in fluid dynamics, specifically within permeable media. Flow lines represent the paths water particles take from upstream to downstream, while equipotential lines indicate points of equal potential energy. The flow line fg is confirmed as correct since water moves horizontally from point f to point g, constrained by an impervious layer below. The flow direction is always towards lower potential, which explains the horizontal flow observed at the boundary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with flow nets in 3D permeable media
  • Knowledge of equipotential lines and their relationship to flow lines
  • Basic concepts of pressure gradients in fluid systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of flow nets in 3D fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of equipotential lines
  • Explore the implications of pressure gradients in fluid flow
  • Investigate real-world applications of flow and equipotential lines in hydrogeology
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in civil engineering, hydrogeology, and environmental science who are looking to deepen their understanding of fluid flow in permeable media.

tzx9633

Homework Statement


It's stated in the notes that line fg is the flow line . Why is it so ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it's wrong . The flow line is defined as a line along which the water paticle travel from upstream to downstream in the permeable medium .

However , in my textbook , it's stated that the water can move only thru the flow net , not in one direction only . So , how could the line fg be the flow line ? How could water flow thru line fg ( horizontally in one direction only) ? [/B]
 

Attachments

  • 675.PNG
    675.PNG
    37.8 KB · Views: 2,024
  • 676.PNG
    676.PNG
    54.9 KB · Views: 747
  • 677.PNG
    677.PNG
    31 KB · Views: 723
Physics news on Phys.org
This isn't my usual area, but I think I follow it.

The solid curves represent flow lines, and as you look deeper below the wall the roughly-circular curves become of greater radius. In the limit, at the fartherest depth, the radius is going to be one of roughly infinite radius, i.e., a straight line.

If you trace the path of a particle of water starting near f (i.e., just above the impervious layer), it will travel directly across to g, hence tracing out its flow line. It can't go deeper (the layer under it is impervious), and it won't rise higher (that would mean going against the flow of water coming from the upper regions), so it is constrained to traveling horizontally from near f over to near g.

A flow net is the 3-D concept they introduce for cases where a 2-D approximation is inadequate. Imagine a permeable medium containing a huge buried basalt boulder—flow around this obstruction will be directed left/right as well as up/down—in a complicated 3-D pattern. There will still be flowlines, but now they'll be in a complicated 3 dimensional non-intersecting pattern.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tzx9633
The equipotential lines are perpendicular to the impervious boundary at ##\overline{fg}##, so they point straight up. The flow is always the the direction of decreasing potential. In this case, that would mean the flow is in the horizontal direction at the boundary.
 
NFuller said:
The equipotential lines are perpendicular to the impervious boundary at ##\overline{fg}##, so they point straight up. The flow is always the the direction of decreasing potential. In this case, that would mean the flow is in the horizontal direction at the boundary.
Why ? Why when the flow is horizontal , the potential is decreasing ?
 
tzx9633 said:
Why ? Why when the flow is horizontal , the potential is decreasing ?
That's why the water moves, it's going from a higher potential to a lower. To the left of the wall the pressure from the dam water overhead is greater, forcing water to migrate to where there's less pressure, from the left to the right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tzx9633
NascentOxygen said:
it will travel directly across to g, hence tracing out its flow line. It can't go deeper (the layer under it is impervious), and it won't rise higher
thanks for the point
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K