Flow rate in unconfined aquifier?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the pumping rate of a well drilled into an unconfined aquifer, with a permeability of 200 m/day. The initial calculations yielded a flow rate of 2.89 m³/s, but the correct answer is 1.06 m³/s. Key errors identified include incorrect logarithmic calculations and misinterpretation of water levels in relation to ground level. The final correct formula for flow rate incorporates the accurate depth measurements and logarithmic values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of groundwater flow principles
  • Familiarity with Darcy's Law and aquifer properties
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions in hydraulic calculations
  • Basic proficiency in using mathematical equations for fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Darcy's Law and its application in groundwater flow analysis
  • Learn about aquifer testing methods and data interpretation
  • Explore the significance of permeability in hydrogeology
  • Investigate the use of logarithmic functions in engineering calculations
USEFUL FOR

Hydrogeologists, civil engineers, environmental scientists, and students studying groundwater hydrology will benefit from this discussion.

tzx9633

Homework Statement



A 40cm well was drilled penetrating straight into unconfined aquifier at depth of 90m . The other wells were drilled at a distance of 20m and 100m from initial well have decrease in water level of 12m and 8m from groundwater level . If the aquifier has a permeability value of 200m / day , what’s the pumping rate of well ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Permeability in m^3 / s = 200/24/3600
H = 90 – 8 = 82
H = 90- 12 = 78

My working is Q = πk( H^2 -h^2) / ln (R /r)= π( (200/24/3600)x (82^2 - 78^2)) / ln(100/200 = 2.89m^3 / s , But the ans provided is 1.06m^3 / s , what's wrong with my answer ? The ans provided is in m^3 /s
 

Attachments

  • 782.PNG
    782.PNG
    24.4 KB · Views: 522
Physics news on Phys.org
tzx9633 said:
H = 90 – 8 = 82
H = 90- 12 = 78
tzx9633 said:
depth of 90m ... decrease in water level
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tzx9633
what do you mean ? Can you explain further ?
 
tzx9633 said:
what do you mean ? Can you explain further ?
If the water level of an aquifer decreases, is it shallower or deeper?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tzx9633
haruspex said:
If the water level of an aquifer decreases, is it shallower or deeper?
Shallower , am i right ?
 
tzx9633 said:
Shallower , am i right ?
Just realized my question was ambiguous.
I meant shallower in the sense of nearer the ground surface. If the water level falls it will be further from the ground surface, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tzx9633
haruspex said:
Just realized my question was ambiguous.
I meant shallower in the sense of nearer the ground surface. If the water level falls it will be further from the ground surface, right?
yes , any part of my working is wrong ? I couldn't get the ans ...
 
tzx9633 said:
yes , any part of my working is wrong ? I couldn't get the ans ...
You are not getting my hints.
The first well is at a depth of 90m, i.e. its water's surface is at 90m below ground level.
The next well has a water surface 12m lower, so how far below ground level is that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tzx9633
haruspex said:
You are not getting my hints.
The first well is at a depth of 90m, i.e. its water's surface is at 90m below ground level.
The next well has a water surface 12m lower, so how far below ground level is that?
102 m ...
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
You are not getting my hints.
The first well is at a depth of 90m, i.e. its water's surface is at 90m below ground level.
The next well has a water surface 12m lower, so how far below ground level is that?
H = 90+ 8 = 98
H = 90 + 12 = 102

My working is Q = πk( H^2 -h^2) / ln (R /r)= π( (200/24/3600)x (102^2 - 98^2)) / ln(100/200 = 3.61m^3 / s , but the ans provided is 1.06m^3 / s , what's wrong with my answer ? Which is still wrong
 
  • #11
Sorry, I should have looked at the diagram sooner. I now see that the wording is misleading. Your original calculation of 82m and 78m was correct. The only error I see in your working is that you have ln(100/200) instead of ln(200/100), but that would have simply flipped the sign.
That said, if I put your numbers through my calculator I get 6.71m3/s.
The equation puzzles me. I do not understand where that π comes from, since it is not getting multiplied by a radius anywhere. The given 40cm does not seem to feature in the equation (is that radius or diameter?), but I can see why it might be irrelevant.

Edit, just noticed you had 200 instead of 20.., just a typo I guess. Now I get your 2.89.

Edit 2: I tried dividing 2.89 by 1.06. It gives a number very close to e. Perhaps a result of fat-fingering a calculator?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K