Fluid Dynamics–Find pipe diameter,head loss & actual mean velocity.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the theoretical diameter of a pipe, head loss due to friction, and actual mean velocity in fluid dynamics. The theoretical diameter was determined to be 120mm using the equation D=sqrt(4*q/(π*U)), with a mean velocity of 0.9m/s derived from the maximum velocity of 1.8m/s. The Reynolds number was calculated as 2902.5, indicating turbulent flow, and the head loss due to friction was initially estimated at 0.205m before being refined to 0.143m using the Darcy equation for turbulent flow. The use of the Moody diagram for friction factor (Cf) was also discussed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, specifically pipe flow.
  • Familiarity with the Darcy-Weisbach equation for head loss.
  • Knowledge of Reynolds number and its significance in flow characterization.
  • Ability to interpret Moody diagrams for friction factors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Darcy-Weisbach equation in detail for various flow regimes.
  • Learn how to calculate friction factors using Moody diagrams.
  • Explore the implications of Reynolds number on flow behavior in pipes.
  • Investigate the relationship between maximum and mean velocities in different flow conditions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those specializing in fluid mechanics, hydraulic engineers, and anyone involved in designing or analyzing pipe systems.

Moranovich
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
a) Calculate the theoretical diameter of pipe, nominal pipe diameter and mean velocity of nominal pipe diameter.

Maximum velocity = 1.8m/s
Q(vol. flow rate) = 0.01M^3-1

b) Find the Reynolds number for the process and then the head loss due to friction, state any assumptions made.

Please see attached diagram***

2. Homework Equations

D=sqrrt 4*q/Pi*U
q=volumetric flow rate
D=theoretical diameter

Q=V*A
V=Q/A
V=mean velocity
A=cros sect area
Q=vol. flow rate

Re=um*d*P/U
Where um=mean velocity
d = diameter of pipe
p = density
U = dynamic viscosity of fluid
Re= Reynolds number

Head loss due to friction Hf=32*U*L*um/P*g*d^2
U = dynamic viscosity of fluid
L length of pipe from the pump = 27m
P= density taken from previous questions I have done for oil= 860Kgm-3
g = gravity 9.81m/s
d = diameter of theoretical pipe =120mm

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I have worked out the theoretical diameter to be 120mm from the first equation assuming that the mean velocity is roughly half the maximum velocity ie 0.9m/s

So sqrrt 4*q/Pi*U = sqrrt 4*0.01/3.142*0.9=0.12m
Then choosing from the table nominal pipe 100mm the actual velocity for the nominal pipe is 1.27m/s using this eq.

Q=V*A
V=Q/A
V=0.01/7.85*10^-3=1.27m/s

To work out the Reynolds number I have used the density and dyn. viscosity from previous questions (860kgm & 0.032)
Re=0.9*0.12*860/0.032=2902.5

To work out the head loss I have used these density and dyn. Viscosity figures again and worked out from the diagram that (from the pump) the length of pipe is 27M.
So Hf=32*0.032*27*0.9/860*9.81*0.12^2=0.205M

So head loss due to friction is 0.205M.

I am not sure if I should use these assumptions i.e density and viscosity that are not given in the question. Am I on the right track or away on a crazy tangent??!

Any help would be much appreciated – thank you in advance.

Cheers
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You're on the right track, but you used the pressure drop equation for laminar flow, and the flow is turbulent (for the viscosity and density you assumed).
 
Thanks for your comment Chestermiller much appreciated.

So I have now used the following Darcy equation for turbulent flow
Hf=4LCfUm^2/2gd

(Cf obtained from Moody diagram)

So = 4*27*0.004*0.9^2 / 2*9.81*0.12
Hf=0.143m of fluid.

Is this the correct method??

Cheers.
 
Moranovich said:
Thanks for your comment Chestermiller much appreciated.

So I have now used the following Darcy equation for turbulent flow
Hf=4LCfUm^2/2gd

(Cf obtained from Moody diagram)

So = 4*27*0.004*0.9^2 / 2*9.81*0.12
Hf=0.143m of fluid.

Is this the correct method??

Cheers.
Yes. This looks right. (But, I haven't checked your arithmetic)
 
Hi there,

I am looking to understand the methods used in questions c) and d)

Can you provide any insight into how i can answer a question similar to these
 
Why is the mean velocity roughly half of the maximum velocity? Does this apply to laminar/turbulent/transitional flows?

Thanks in advanced
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
6K