Fluid dynamics, Pipe Flow, Hagen Poiseuille, Darcy's equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to fluid dynamics, specifically focusing on laminar flow in a capillary tube. Participants explore the application of the Hagen-Poiseuille equation and Darcy's equation to determine the maximum average velocity and pressure drop in a water injection line. The conversation also touches on the importance of viscosity in these calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants discuss the parameters of a water injection line, including diameter and length, and the implications for laminar flow.
  • There is confusion regarding the diameter of the capillary tubing, with one participant suggesting it may be incorrectly stated as 25 mm instead of 0.25 mm.
  • Some participants emphasize the necessity of knowing the viscosity of water to solve the problem, while others express frustration over the lack of provided data.
  • One participant notes that the viscosity of water at room temperature is approximately 1 centipoise, suggesting this as a reference point.
  • There is a discussion about whether it is possible to circumvent the need for viscosity in the calculations, with one participant asserting that it is not feasible.
  • Participants reference the Hagen-Poiseuille equation and its role in determining pressure drop and flow velocity, questioning the accuracy of the equation presented by one participant.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions that can be made regarding temperature and viscosity in the absence of explicit information in the problem statement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of viscosity in the calculations but disagree on the adequacy of the problem statement and whether assumptions can be made regarding viscosity and temperature. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take without complete information.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific information regarding viscosity and temperature in the problem statement, which may affect the ability to solve the problem accurately. There is also mention of the potential for similar questions to appear on exams without access to external resources.

sandpants
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A water injection line is made from smooth capillary tubing with inside
diameter D = 25.0 mm . If the length of the pipe is 0.75 m and assuming
laminar flow is present up to Re = 2000, find

(i) the maximum average velocity at which the flow is laminar
(ii) the pressure drop required to deliver this maximum velocity.

[Answer: (i) u = 8 m/s; (ii) ∆p = 3 072 MPa ]

Homework Equations


Everything related to laminar flows in pipes used the hagen poiseuille equation and Darcy's equations.

u=-1/4μ*(dP/dx)(R^2-r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Just some random substitutions, like setting -(dP/dx)=Δp/L and then equating that to Darcy's 4f/d*ρU^2/2

But the issue is the viscosity. I can't get rid of it, and I can't find it. Though I can understand why it is not given, as it would make things way too easy.

Anything about viscosity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sandpants said:

Homework Statement


A water injection line is made from smooth capillary tubing with inside
diameter D = 25.0 mm . If the length of the pipe is 0.75 m and assuming
laminar flow is present up to Re = 2000, find

(i) the maximum average velocity at which the flow is laminar
(ii) the pressure drop required to deliver this maximum velocity.

[Answer: (i) u = 8 m/s; (ii) ∆p = 3 072 MPa ]


Homework Equations


Everything related to laminar flows in pipes used the hagen poiseuille equation and Darcy's equations.

u=-1/4μ*(dP/dx)(R^2-r^2)


The Attempt at a Solution



Just some random substitutions, like setting -(dP/dx)=Δp/L and then equating that to Darcy's 4f/d*ρU^2/2

But the issue is the viscosity. I can't get rid of it, and I can't find it. Though I can understand why it is not given, as it would make things way too easy.

Anything about viscosity?

Look up the viscosity of water at room temperature. At 20C, it's about 1 centipoise.

Are you sure about that diameter? 25 mm sounds like an awfully big capillary. Did you mean 25μm?

If you know the viscosity, the density, the diameter, and the Reynolds number, you have enough info to calculate the average velocity.

The equation you wrote is not the Hagen Poiseuille equation. That equation expresses the pressure drop in terms of either the volumetric throughput rate, or equivalently, the average velocity. What is that equation?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Look up the viscosity of water at room temperature. At 20C, it's about 1 centipoise.

Are you sure about that diameter? 25 mm sounds like an awfully big capillary. Did you mean 25μm?

If you know the viscosity, the density, the diameter, and the Reynolds number, you have enough info to calculate the average velocity.

The equation you wrote is not the Hagen Poiseuille equation. That equation expresses the pressure drop in terms of either the volumetric throughput rate, or equivalently, the average velocity. What is that equation?

Chet

You are right about the diameter. Its 0.25mm.

Non the less, if viscosity was given it would be awfully easy to get the velocity. Another thing is, no temperature is given, which it is a bit iffy to make an assumption about what viscosity to use. Is there no way to get it out of there?
 
sandpants said:
You are right about the diameter. Its 0.25mm.

Non the less, if viscosity was given it would be awfully easy to get the velocity. Another thing is, no temperature is given, which it is a bit iffy to make an assumption about what viscosity to use. Is there no way to get it out of there?

What's the context of this exercise? What values for the viscosity of water have you been given in your notes/textbook? In short, is there anything which suggests that you should do otherwise than assume a temperature of 20 degrees? Working backwards from the given answer suggests that you are supposed to make that assumption, so there must be something in the context to tell you that or the exercise is poorly designed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
You know that, in the real world, you are not going to be spoon fed all the data. If you knew that the problem statement was missing the viscosity, you should have looked it up. After all, the problem statement did say room temperature. Would it have mattered much to the answer if you had used 22C or 23C? All you needed to do was to google viscosity of water. PAsmith confirmed that this would have been the right thing to do.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I assumed that there must be a way to circumvent viscosity because the emphasis of the topic was the equation u=-1/4μ*(dP/dx)*(R^2-r^2) (for laminar flows). Knowing viscosity means you can find the velocity through reynolds number Re=ρud/μ which is kinda trivial. Only thing that's left is finding the pressure difference which is not difficult either.

All that was given was what I wrote. Something like that can pop up on the exam and I don't get to check water viscosity on the internet.

It does work out in the end, yeah. I'm asking for clarity though, is there no way to circumvent needing viscosity there?
 
Definitely not.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
19K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K