Fluid Dynamics standard reference

AI Thread Summary
Standard references for fluid dynamics include G. K. Batchelor's "An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics" and Landau and Lifshitz's Volume 6, which are commonly used by physicists. Sommerfeld's classic work on hydrodynamics is noted for its engaging problems, such as smoke rings. For computational fluid dynamics (CFD), recommended texts include "Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics" by M. Holt, "Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics" by C. A. Fletcher, and "Computational Fluid Dynamics, An Introduction" by J. F. Wendt. Additionally, D. Acheson's "Elementary Fluid Dynamics" and T. Faber's "Fluid Dynamics for Physicists" are also mentioned as valuable resources. The discussion also touches on the frustration regarding the inability to mention the name Lifshitz freely.
Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
Hi. What's a standard reference for physicsts concerning the topic of fluid dynamics or computational FD.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
G. K. Batchelor "An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics", and Landau and Lif****z Vol. 6 are the ones that I am used to. Also, Sommerfeld wrote a good old-school book on hydrodynamics where he treats a lot of cute problems like smoke rings and whatnot.
 
What about for CFD?
 
computational fluid dynamics... sorry, I don't know.
 
olgranpappy said:
G. K. Batchelor "An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics", and Landau and Lif****z Vol. 6 are the ones that I am used to. Also, Sommerfeld wrote a good old-school book on hydrodynamics where he treats a lot of cute problems like smoke rings and whatnot.

I've used those and D. Acheson's "Elementary Fluid Dynamics" and T. Faber's "Fluid dynamics for physicists".

As for CFD, the course at my uni recommends "Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics" by M. Holt, "Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics" by C. A. Fletcher and "Computational Fluid Dynamics, An Introduction" by J. F. Wendt

PS: It's outrageous that we can't say L-i-f-s-h-i-t-z! :smile:
 
GDogg said:
PS: It's outrageous that we can't say L-i-f-s-h-i-t-z! :smile:

yeah. I complained about that, but they never got back to me.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top