Fluid mechanics problem, need explanation please

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a fluid mechanics problem where the user seeks clarification on two points regarding the forces acting on a plug. The first question addresses why the plug is not treated as a vertical wall for calculating force, to which the response explains that the integral can be simplified due to the small size of the plug. The second question concerns the atmospheric pressure force, which is noted to be equal on both sides of the plug, allowing it to be ignored in calculations. The conversation emphasizes understanding the simplifications made in fluid mechanics problems. Overall, the exchange highlights the nuances of pressure forces in fluid dynamics.
Bassel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi please check the highlighted question in the attachment and the solution and see the problem, i need help please. I have two questions about it:

1- why didn't we take the plug as a vertical wall and thus the force would be integral of pressure x area?

2-WHERE DID THE FORCE DUE TO ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE GO?

Thnx for your help.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-08-27 at 9.48.23 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2013-08-27 at 9.48.23 PM.jpg
    57.6 KB · Views: 505
  • Screen Shot 2013-08-27 at 9.54.15 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-08-27 at 9.54.15 PM.png
    18.5 KB · Views: 480
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bassel! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Bassel said:
1- why didn't we take the plug as a vertical wall and thus the force would be integral of pressure x area?

You did.

You did ∫ ρgA(H+h) dh, but the plug is so small that you can take H+h to be a constant, H …

so that integral is just ∫ ρgAH dh :wink:
2-WHERE DID THE FORCE DUE TO ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE GO?

it nipped round the other side when you weren't looking, and started pushing back :smile:

(so it's the same on both sides, and you can ignore it)
 
by the other side you mean from outside ??
 
yes, the plug has two sides :smile:
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

How does a pressure distribution keep the fluid from moving?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Does Fluid Dynamics Explain Pressure Gradients in a Frictionless Tube?
Replies
48
Views
6K
Gauge pressure in Momentum conservation of fluids.
Replies
15
Views
7K
Simple Fluid mechanics question, Need Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Pressure and normal stress in fluid mechanics
Replies
1
Views
2K
A manometer measures mechanical or thermodynamic pressure?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Lagrange-Young equation in Fluid Mechanics
Replies
7
Views
3K
Why Does the Shape of a Container Not Affect Fluid Pressure Calculations?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Speed and pressure relative to a piston (fluids)
Replies
3
Views
4K
Tornadoes and angular momentum
Replies
15
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top