Flux from a given charge distribution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric flux through specific spherical surfaces given a charge distribution on concentric spherical shells. The charge distributions are specified in microcoulombs per square meter, and the surfaces of interest are located at radii of 1.5m and 2.5m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the enclosed charge by multiplying the charge density by the surface area of the spheres. There is uncertainty regarding the units of flux and whether the calculated values are reasonable, particularly concerning the scale of the results.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided feedback on the original poster's calculations and assumptions, with some clarifying the correct units for flux. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of the results and the understanding of the physical concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the units of flux and the scale of the calculated values, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the relationships between charge, flux, and their respective units.

ryukyu
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three concentric spherical shells ,r=1m ,r=2m and r=3m, respectively, have charge
distributions 2, −4, and 5 μC/m2.

Calculate the flux through r=1.5m and r=2.5m



Homework Equations



Since we are talking about Gaussian surfaces I assume that the flux at 1.5m is just the flux contained in the 1m shell.

I'm particularly having trouble figuring out what to do with the data. Given that the charge distribution is given in uC/m^2, I assume we need to multiply this by the surface area of each sphere to find the total enclosed charge (Qenc).

Then I have that flux = Qenc0. But these answers seem way too high.


The Attempt at a Solution



SA1=4(pi)r2=4(pi)m2
Qenc1=4(pi)m2*2uC/m2=8(pi)uC
flux=8(pi)uC/ε0=2.84x106C
where ε0=(10-9/(36*pi))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer is correct.
 
Thanks for the quick response. The whole mega-Coulomb just had me worried.
 
ryukyu said:
Thanks for the quick response. The whole mega-Coulomb just had me worried.
It is not mega -Coulomb. Flux is not measured in C, but in Weber.
 
I've got it straightened out now. I was assuming eps0 was unitless. But even given that enlightenment, are these really mega-Webers that seems even more out of scale?
 
No. It is not out of scale.
 
Thanks again. I have been working on the homework for this class for at least 30 hours on and off and it's only 7 problems. The professor's method of instruction and my method of learning just don't blend well and that's not his fault, I just need to learn a new way to learn.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
5K