1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Flux through a circle not centered at origin.

  1. Dec 13, 2009 #1
    I feel really dumb for this, but I keep getting strange answers so I may be forgetting something.

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Find the magnetic flux through a circle in the xz plane of radius "a" due to a wire. . The center of the circle is (b,0,0).


    2. Relevant equations
    Well I found the magnetic field to be proportional to
    [tex]\frac{1}{\rho}[/tex]

    That field has only a component in the phi direction.

    Where rho and phi are cylindrical coordinates.


    3. The attempt at a solution
    I can't figure out the limits of integration for anything unless it's rectangular coordinates, but those become very messy and I obtain an integral which is clearly wrong. I KNOW the answer should reduce to something "nice."

    I know I'm missing something stupid here.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 13, 2009 #2

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Where is the wire? I guess it's the z-axis?
     
  4. Dec 13, 2009 #3
    Yes, it is. It's an infinite wire carrying current I in the z-hat direction. Basically using the result of a previous problem, I know what the B field is. I just chose not to include the rest of the stuff for that field in this question.
     
  5. Dec 13, 2009 #4

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    According to wikipedia, [tex]\Phi _B=\iint _S \vec B \cdot d \vec S[/tex].
    I'm not able to solve the problem so I'd love someone to help us.
    If you have the expression of B in all the circle, I think it's easy to solve the integral.
     
  6. Dec 13, 2009 #5
    I obtained B and I know what the definition of the magnetic flux is. I also know the vector element of area for cylindrical coordinates results in an integral over just [tex]\frac{1}{\rho}[/tex]

    IE, I have

    [tex]
    \Phi _B= k \iint _S \frac{1}{\rho} d\rho dz
    [/tex]
    where k is a constant (having trouble texing the constants).
    The issue is I am unsure of what to make the limits of integration.
     
  7. Dec 13, 2009 #6

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Are you sure you have a [tex]d\rho dz[/tex] as a differential area? You said you were working cylindrical coordinates, I'm confused.
     
  8. Dec 13, 2009 #7
  9. Dec 13, 2009 #8

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

  10. Dec 13, 2009 #9
    What? Phi is the angle that goes counterclockwise from the x axis. I would NOT be integrating over dphi because phi is constant = 0. The circle lies in the xz plane.

    Draw the circle out on a piece of paper to see what I mean. Clearly rho does not go from 0 to a. Rho goes from (b-a) to (b+a) when z =0, and it goes from b to b when z = a. The limits of integration over the inner integral are clearly not constant.
     
  11. Dec 13, 2009 #10
    Well, you could divide the circle into infinitesimal horizontal slices and calculate what is the area dA of a slice as a function of x (through trigonometry). On the circle, B is proportional to 1/x so the flux through a slice would be just B(x)(dA/dx)dx which you could integrate along the x axis. However, this gives a complicated integral which I'm not sure how to solve.
     
  12. Dec 13, 2009 #11
    I tried a similar approach and obtained an integral which Mathematica integrated to have imaginary parts != 0. Im curious if I could shift my origin (make a substitution) and then convert to spherical coordinates (probably the other order). The spherical coordinates integral (after the substitution) for r would be from 0 to a, and for theta it would be 0 to pi. After the origin shift, my B field will still be in phi-hat direction only due to the symmetry.
     
  13. Dec 13, 2009 #12

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    My error, I thought it was in the x-y plane, sorry about that.
     
  14. Dec 13, 2009 #13
    It does that because it doesn't know the values of a and b, they might be such that the thing inside the square root is negative. If we assume that b>a>0, however, it's clear that the value of the integral is real. You have to use assumptions, though i don't know how to do that in Mathematica. Anyway, I got (assuming B(x) = B0/x)

    [tex]\Phi = \int_{b-a}^{b+a} \frac{2 B_0 \sqrt{a^2 -(b-x)^2}}{x}dx = 2 B_0 a \int_{\frac{b}{a}-1}^{\frac{b}{a}+1} \frac{ \sqrt{1 -(\frac{b}{a}-x)^2}}{x}dx[/tex]

    which according to Maple is

    [tex]2 B_0 a \,{\frac {\pi \, \left( 1+\frac{b}{a}\,\sqrt {-1+{\frac{b^2}{a^2}}}-{\frac{b^2}{a^2}} \right) }{
    \sqrt {-1+{\frac{b^2}{a^2}}}}}
    [/tex]

    which can be simplified to [tex]2 \pi B_0 (b - \sqrt{b^2-a^2}) [/tex]

    Which isn't that bad in the end (assuming I didn't make a mistake). I'm not sure how to calculate the integral by hand though.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2009
  15. Dec 13, 2009 #14
    YES! Thank you. That's exactly what the result should simplify to (it's very similar to that of a toroid, after all a toroid is roughly just N of those). Thank you. You were right, I didn't make the assumptions in Mathematica, but I'm still quite a novice and don't know how to do that yet.

    Thank you :)
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook