# Surface Integral, Polar Coordinates

1. Feb 16, 2015

### BOAS

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Express $f(x,y) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2}}}\frac{y}{\sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2}}}e^{-2\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}}$ in terms of the polar coordinates $\rho$ and $\phi$ and then evaluate the integral of $f(x,y)$ over a circle of radius 1 centered at the origin.

2. Relevant equations
$y = \rho \sin(\phi)$
$\rho = \sqrt{x^{2} + y^{2}}$

3. The attempt at a solution

Using the above relevant equations;

$f(\rho,\phi) = \frac{\sin(\phi)}{\rho}e^{-2\rho}$.

I am confused about what the second half of this question is asking me to do. The integral of a function gives the area under the curve, so surely evaluating an integral over a circle, merely gives the area of the circle?

It also looks like it would make more sense to evaluate the integral of $f(\rho,\phi)$ than $f(x,y)$.

EDIT - I just had a rather obvious thought. This is akin to asking me to find the mass of a circle, with density given by the function... If that's correct, then I think i'm ok.

EDIT2 - Also, with regards to performing the integral of $f(x,y)$ the fact that it is a circle radius 1 means that $\sqrt{x^2 + y^2} = 1$, right? So that makes my job much easier.

I'd appreciate some guidance about what this question is asking of me.

Thanks.

Last edited: Feb 16, 2015
2. Feb 16, 2015

### skrat

You can calculate an integral in any coordinate system you wish. But often problems have nice symmetries that massively simplify the integration itself.

This problem is a nice example. What you have to realize is that $f(x,y)$ and $f(\rho, \phi)$ are in fact absolutely the same, just written in different coordinate system. So calculating the integral of $f(x,y)$ in cartesian coordinates brings you to the same result as calculating the integral of $f(\rho ,\phi)$ in polar coordinates. And that is exactly what the second part of your problem wants to demonstrate.

3. Feb 16, 2015

### BOAS

I can see that, but i'm struggling to wrap my head around the limits in the cartesian case. The polar coordinates make much more sense when building the mental picture...

4. Feb 16, 2015

### skrat

Sure they so, that's the point. :)

Anway, in cartesian coordinate system, you just have to be a bit more careful. Since the problem says, that the radius of the circle is $1$, this in cartesian coordinates means (as you already mentioned) $x^2+y^2=1$.
And you are trying to calculate $\int \int f(x,y)dydx$. What are the boundaries of both integrals? (Hint: One integral is trivial, the other isn't.)

5. Feb 16, 2015

### Ray Vickson

Is your wording of the question exactly as it was given to you? The reason I ask is that there is an ambiguity: "circle" really means a one-dimensional curve, while "disc" means the two-dimensional area whose boundary is the circle. So, are you supposed to do a one-dimensional integral over a circle, or a two-dimensional integral over a disc? I know you entitled your thread "surface integral...", but is that really what you are supposed to do?

6. Feb 16, 2015

### BOAS

I think I need to evaluate the integral for x between -1 and 1, and y between $\sqrt{1-x^{2}}$ and $-\sqrt{1-x^{2}}$

7. Feb 16, 2015

### BOAS

The wording of the question is exactly as written.

I think it means to perform the double integral over a disc, because that is something we have focused on a few weeks ago, and I see no mention of the distinction you are making in the course document I have.

8. Feb 16, 2015

### Ray Vickson

9. Feb 16, 2015

### HallsofIvy

Staff Emeritus
I would feel a lot better about this if it had said "over a disk of radius 1 centered at the origin". A "disk" is the set of points inside the circle. But you cannot integrate a scalar function over a curve- you have to have a vector valued function or a gradient of a scalar function.

Last edited: Feb 17, 2015
10. Feb 16, 2015

### skrat

Ray pointed out a very important question. There is of course a huge difference (in shape and therefore also) in integrating. When this is clear, you can continue.

If it is a disk:
Correct, but the result will be zero. (Question: Why?)
Use x from -1 to 1 and y from 0 to $\sqrt {1-x^2}$ and than multiply the whole integral by two. Ig got $2\frac{e^2-1}{e^2}$ and you hope you get the same.

11. Feb 16, 2015

### BOAS

I appreciate the difference - I have sent an email to my lecturer asking for clarification, but am going to proceed with the surface integral interpretation of the question, because it makes more sense in the context of the course.

12. Feb 16, 2015

### BOAS

the area below the x axis will cancel out with the area above, giving zero.