Foca length of a concave mirror

AI Thread Summary
A concave mirror with a focal length of 10 cm in air has its focal length altered when placed in a liquid with a refractive index of 1.2. The depth of the liquid is 7.5 cm, but due to the refractive properties of the liquid, the rays do not converge to a single focal point. Instead, the actual focus is located 2.5 cm from the water surface, and the apparent focal point cannot be determined as the rays refract away from the normal. The discussion highlights that the angles of reflection remain unaffected by the refractive index, leading to the conclusion that there is no definitive focal point in this scenario. Overall, the interaction of light rays with the liquid complicates the mirror's focal properties.
Steven7
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A concave mirror of focal length 10cm in air is put into a beaker containing a liquid up to 7.5cm. Refractive index of the liquid is 1.2. What is the focal length of the mirror inside the beaker?

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried proportion method:
Depth Focal length
7.5cm 10cm
6.25cm(Apparent depth) 8.33cm
But I'm not convinced that this method is a legal operation. Any other way I could find the new f for the mirror?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle of reflection is equal to the angle of incidence.
 
Well any more hints? I can't think of any equation finding new f using angles.
 
For an assigned question it's peculiar. Is it a trick question? Do you notice that the angles of reflection are independent of the index of refraction? It's a mirror not a lens.

The light rays change medium at the water surface. This is where the index of refraction counts. The distance traveled in water is variable; "up to 7.5 cm."
 
If there were no water, the parallel beam of light would have come to focus at 10 cm from the mirror. But because of water, after 7.5 cm, the rays will refract away from the normal and come to focus nearer to the water surface. Actual distance of the focus from the water surface 2.5 cm. Apparent position of the focus is d.
So refractive index = 2.5/d.
 
It can be shown, without arduous geometric or algebraic proof, that the rays passing through the water surface will not meet at a point. There is no focal point.

To show this, consider the angle of total internal reflection. For n2/n1=1.2, the angle of this ray within the water is 56.44 degrees from a normal line passing through the surface. In the air, the ray proceeds at 90 degrees from the normal, grazing the water surface.

Compare this to the ray reflected from the center of the mirror. It passes through the water at zero degrees from normal and is undeflected. It meets the other ray at an altitude of zero cm. above the water.

Consider any other ray between zero and 56.44 degrees. It will meet the normal ray, from the mirror's center, at some finite, non-zero distance above the water's surface. All three rays do not converge to a point.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top