Food Hot Plate vs Science Hot Plate

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the suitability of using a standard "food" hot plate for high school chemistry demonstrations compared to a specialized "science" hot plate. Participants explore concerns related to temperature control, safety, and the implications of using a less reliable heating source for chemical experiments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a normal hot plate would be a bad idea for high school chemistry demonstrations.
  • A customer review highlights that a cheap hot plate has a thermostat that controls temperature poorly, leading to significant fluctuations.
  • Another participant asks if temperature consistency is critical for specific experiments, such as turning a penny into bronze.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of cheap hot plates, with one participant noting that some reviews mention failure after a short period.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about how often consistent heat is necessary in high school experiments.
  • Safety concerns are discussed, particularly regarding the use of flammable solvents with food hot plates, which may not be designed to prevent ignition risks.
  • A vivid scenario is presented about the dangers of overheating flammable solvents with a food hot plate, emphasizing the potential for accidents and the importance of safety and control.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of food hot plates for chemistry demonstrations, with some emphasizing safety and reliability concerns while others question the necessity of consistent heat. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best choice for high school experiments.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about the reliability and safety of hot plates, as well as the specific requirements of different chemical demonstrations. The discussion does not resolve the implications of using a food hot plate versus a scientific hot plate.

mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
"Food" Hot Plate vs "Science" Hot Plate

I want to pick up a cheap hot plate for doing high school level demonstrations in chemistry. Is there any reason getting a normal hot plate would be a bad idea? Like this one?

Thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
From a customer review for the cheap hot plate on Amazon.

...the included thermostat only very roughly controls the temperature and allows it to fluctuate wildly.

That never happens with the http://sargentwelch.com/vwr-hotplate-stirrer/p/IG0037202/ I have used.
 


Will that matter much for high school level demos and experiments? Stuff like turning a penny into bronze by heating zinc sulfate, etc. Thanks.
 


Only you know the answer to that. Read some other reviews that describe it working for 2 weeks and then... KAPUT.
 


Well, I mean, how often do you really need a consistent heat source? What sort of things is it critical you don't have heat fluctuations? I'm coming from a lack of upper level chemistry experience/lab classes.
 


Exactly. Imagine you want to boil something flammable with this hotplate. You keep increasing the setting but it isn't boiling. You wait. And wait. Nothing is happening. You increase the setting a little further and WHAM. The hotplate goes into overdrive, overheating the solvent which boils with such force that the glass joints are blown apart and the apparatus falls to the floor. The boiling solvent fills the air with a cloud of flammable vapor, searching for a source of ignition.

Safety and control are priceless.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K