For a set of vectors to span R4 question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samuelb88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Span Vectors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of determining whether a given set of vectors, specifically u = {1,-2,2,1}, v = {1,3,1,1}, and w = {3,4,4,3}, can span R4. The original poster attempts to analyze the linear dependence of these vectors and seeks to identify additional vectors that would complete the set to span R4.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the linear dependence of the vectors u, v, and w, with some suggesting the use of the Gram-Schmidt process to create a basis. Others question the possibility of adding just one vector to span R4, indicating that at least two additional vectors may be necessary.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the linear dependence of the original vectors and suggesting methods for constructing a spanning set. There is recognition that the original set cannot span R4 as it stands, and various approaches to finding a solution are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the linear dependence of the initial vectors and discuss the implications of this on the ability to span R4. There is mention of constraints related to the choice of additional vectors, particularly in relation to standard basis vectors for R4.

Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The set of vectors u = {1,-2,2,1}, v = {1,3,1,1}, w = {3,4,4,3} cannot span R4. Complete this set to create a set of vectors that will span R4. Show that your set of vectors spans R4.

The Attempt at a Solution


Let y = {y_1,y_2,y_3,y_4}. I write span{u,v,w,y} as the coefficient matrix:

[1,1,3,y_1
-2,3,4,y_2
2,1,4,y_3
1,1,3,y_4]

Using the first row to produce zeros in each row below yields:

[1,1,3,y_1
0,5,10,y_2+2y_1
0,-1,-2,y_3-2y_1
0,0,0,y_4-y_1]

Using the second row to produce zeros in the row below yields:

[1,1,3,y_1
0,5,10,y_2+2y_1
0,0,0,5y_3-9y_2+2y_1
0,0,0,y_4-y_1]

So to my understanding, it would seem given the set {u,v,w}, a fourth vector y cannot be chosen so that the set {u,v,w,y} spans R4 since not every row can contain a pivot position in this case. Please correct me if I am wrong.

- Sam

PS sorry for the messy work - I don't know how to write matrices in latex.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that u, v, and w are linearly dependent. Have you learned about the Gram-Schmidt process for constructing a basis yet?
 
Mark44 said:
The problem is that u, v, and w are linearly dependent. Have you learned about the Gram-Schmidt process for constructing a basis yet?

No I haven't. To my understanding though, the Gram-Schmidt process creates a set (for this case) of vectors {u',v',w'} so that v' is orthogonal to u', w' is orthogonal to v' and I suppose u', v', and w' are linearly independent so I may choose a fourth vector y' to "complete" this set so that this completed set spans R4?
 
You can use G-S to construct all four vectors of a basis for R4.
 
Samuelb88 said:
So to my understanding, it would seem given the set {u,v,w}, a fourth vector y cannot be chosen so that the set {u,v,w,y} spans R4 since not every row can contain a pivot position in this case. Please correct me if I am wrong.
You're right. You can't add just one more vector and span R4. You need to add two or more because, as Mark noted, the three you have are linearly dependent.
PS sorry for the messy work - I don't know how to write matrices in latex.
You can use the bmatrix environment to produce matrices in LaTeX. Click on the one below to see what the code is.

\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 3 &amp; y_1 \\<br /> -2 &amp; 3 &amp; 4 &amp; y_2 \\<br /> 2 &amp; 1 &amp; 4 &amp; y_3 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 3 &amp; y_4<br /> \end{bmatrix}
 
Don't include 0. Your u, v, and w are linearly dependent, which can be seen from the first 3 columns of your last matrix (but taken one step further).

\begin{bmatrix}1 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\0 &amp; 1 &amp; 2 \\0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\end{bmatrix}

This says c1 + c3 = 0, and that c2 + 2c3= 0, where c1, cw, and c3 are the coefficients of u, v, and w. If you let c3 = 1, then c1 = -1, c2 = -2, and c3 = 1.

In other words -u -2v + w = 0, so it can be seen that anyone of these vectors can be solved for in terms of the other two.

Without knowing G-S, I suppose the best way is to pick two of the three vectors, say u and v, and then try to find two more vectors out of the set of standard basis vectors for R4 - {<1, 0, 0, 0>, <0, 1, 0, 0>, <0, 0, 1, 0>, <0, 0, 0, 1>} - so that you have four linearly independent vectors.

For your spanning set you can throw in w.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K