For someone wanting to work in astronomy

  • Thread starter Thread starter dros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Work
AI Thread Summary
Choosing between an Astrophysics degree and a Physics degree is a crucial decision for aspiring astronomers. While both programs share a similar course load, Physics offers more flexibility for non-scientific career paths. A Physics degree provides a solid theoretical foundation essential for astrophysics research, covering topics like radiative transfer and gravitational physics. However, students may need to actively seek out astronomy-related experiences, such as observational work and data analysis, which are often more integrated into Astrophysics programs. It's important to start with foundational math and physics courses to explore interests and maintain flexibility in career options. A Physics major with a minor in Astronomy can be beneficial, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of both fields. Ultimately, gaining a broad exposure to various scientific disciplines during undergraduate studies can open up unexpected career opportunities and enhance overall knowledge in the field.
dros
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For someone wanting to work in astronomy...

...is an Astrophysics degree the way to go or should I go with Physics? I'm a first-year undergrad who sort of spent the past semester and a half thinking I'd be a History major. I have a strong interest in astronomy and would love to work in the field. After realizing that History wasn't "for me" (and lacking in career paths) I considered taking up a physics/astrophysics degree. Just as a note, I am aware that these programs are math-intensive, but I am willing to put in the effort. I have no aversion to math and performed well in my high school algebra and precalculus classes.

From what I have heard, Astrophysics is not as flexible as Physics as far as getting non-scientific jobs goes (for instance, in case something goes wrong and I have to look for a job outside of physics).
This of course ignores that the "Professional Physics" and "Astrophysics" programs at my university are almost identical in course load.

I'm aware that in order to get into a serious position as a researcher I would need a MS and PhD, but I'd still like to know where to start.

Thank you, and I'm sorry if you get a ton of these questions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well I'm not in college yet, but I would say start taking the base level math and physics required. Get your feet wet in a few areas, decide what feels right. And if latter on you decide to change you will have the option being as the court requirements are very similar.
 


course not court
 


Yeah, that's a good point since the courses don't even change until the 3rd year or so, and even then it's not that significant of a change.

What about majoring in Physics and minoring in Astronomy?
 


I have mixed feelings about this. I think a basic degree in physics will give you a lot of good theory background for astrophysics research, like radiative transfer, hydrodynamics, and possibly gravitational physics/cosmology if you manage to take some GR and/or DG as an undergrad.

However in my experience, in a physics degree its rare to get to do astronomy (observational work, photometry, spectroscopy, data reduction, the statistics astronomers use) and to get experience with that you'll probably have to be very very proactive in searching out summer/voluntary research opportunities to try it out.

Having said this, most people I know in an "astrophysics" Bsc in the UK get tons of experience doing this, as they have entire courses dedicated to it, but from what I've seen don't get nearly enough math methods, statistical mechanics, fluid dynamics, GR, and analytical dynamics as I did, which I feel are really hard subjects to learn on one's own in a time efficient manner and are vital for astrophysics research that isn't exclusively observational.

It's also possible that throughout a physics degree you may be turned on to other areas of science you never thought you'd like, I've seen it happen a lot and I think it's a good thing to get a broader exposure as I did in a straight physics Bsc.
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
809
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
976
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top