For this pulley system, why is it m1g - T1-T2=m1a?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a pulley system involving three masses: m1 = 66.0 kg, m2 = 37.4 kg, and m3 = 21.8 kg. The equation m1g - T1 - T2 = m1a is established as the correct representation of forces acting on mass m1, where T1 and T2 are the tensions in the ropes. The confusion arises from the alternative equation T1 + T2 - m1g = m1a, which leads to inconsistencies due to the choice of direction for positive acceleration. Consistency in defining the positive direction is crucial for accurate analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams
  • Knowledge of tension in ropes and gravitational force
  • Basic principles of pulley systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's laws in multi-body systems
  • Learn how to draw and analyze free body diagrams for complex systems
  • Explore the effects of different mass configurations on acceleration in pulley systems
  • Investigate the role of direction conventions in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying dynamics and forces in pulley systems will benefit from this discussion.

paki123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
4-p-047.gif

Three objects with masses m1 = 66.0 kg, m2 = 37.4 kg, and m3 = 21.8 kg are hanging from ropes that run over pulleys. What is the acceleration of m1? (Take the upward direction to be positive.)

So for the two outside blocks,

I know that the forces acting on the blocks are T1=m2g+m2a, and T2=m3g+m2a

But why in literally every break down of this problem I see, the force acting on the main block is m1g - T1-T2 = m1a, but not T1+T2-m1g=m1a?

I can't seem to get the answer when I do it with the latter force layout because I end up with a negative not belonging somewhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paki123 said:
I know that the forces acting on the blocks are T1=m2g+m2a, and T2=m3g+m2a

But why in literally every break down of this problem I see, the force acting on the main block is m1g - T1-T2 = m1a, but not T1+T2-m1g=m1a?

I think you have a typo in the T2 equation, which I've marked in boldface.

The difference between m1g - T1-T2 = m1a and T1+T2-m1g=m1a is just the difference between choosing the positive direction up and the positive direction down; the two left-hand sides are just negatives of one another. Be sure you're consistent in applying your positive-up convention, and consider (no math required for this part, just common sense) whether for this particular combination of weights you expect the middle mass to be accelerating upwards or downwards. Whatever the middle mass does, the end masses will have the opposite sign because they're going in the other direction.
 
paki123 said:
4-p-047.gif

Three objects with masses m1 = 66.0 kg, m2 = 37.4 kg, and m3 = 21.8 kg are hanging from ropes that run over pulleys. What is the acceleration of m1? (Take the upward direction to be positive.)

So for the two outside blocks,

I know that the forces acting on the blocks are T1=m2g+m2a, and T2=m3g+m2a

But why in literally every break down of this problem I see, the force acting on the main block is m1g - T1-T2 = m1a, but not T1+T2-m1g=m1a?

I can't seem to get the answer when I do it with the latter force layout because I end up with a negative not belonging somewhere.

When ever you do pulley problems, follow simple basics(drawing a free body diagram) and laws. If you over think, things become more complex. Here in the given case you don't know in what direction m1/m2/m3 moves, since it is nowhere given in the question that m1 moves down and m2 and m3 move up. You have taken it for granted that m2 and m3 move up which makes m1 move down. The question i ask you here is what made you think that m1 moves down?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K