What is the Force Formulation of Dark Energy?

particlemania
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Well what is the apparent force applied on two bodies of mass m1 and m2 due to Cosmological Constant?

First of all, what is the meaning of a constantly accelerating expansion of universe? Is the second time derivative of volume constant or that of the diametric size of universe?

Well in a lecture by Leonard Susskind, I remember, he said that the force is of a form similar to elastic spring force, just repulsive in nature. That is, for a universal constant k, the force is kr, in repulsive sense.

But in History Channel Documentary featuring Michio Kaku and Sean Caroll, it said that Expansion preserves proportion, and a mass-independent force will mean a mass-dependent acceleration, which wouldn't preserve proportions.

So what is the force formulation of dark energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The effect of dark energy on the expansion of space is a result of gravitational phenomena. This behavior is described by Einstein's Equations. What's important to understand is that objects in the universe are not undergoing acceleration relative to their local frames of reference, the way, say, a car accelerates down a roadway. Rather, objects in the universe (like galaxies and clusters of galaxies) are at rest relative to their surroundings -- it is the space itself that is expanding, and they are carried along with it. What we mean by accelerated expansion is this:

\ddot{a} > 0

where a(t) is the scale factor of the universe. This function determines the distance between points in spacetime. As it grows larger, points on the spacetime manifold grow further apart. The physical manifestation of this is an expanding universe.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

Back
Top