Force in a potential field V(x,y,z)

AI Thread Summary
To find the force in the x-direction on a particle in a potential field V(x,y,z), the relationship is given by the equation F = -∇V, indicating that the force is the negative gradient of the potential. If the particle starts at rest, the initial velocity is zero, which implies no magnetic force is involved. Clarification is needed on whether the particle is charged, as this could affect the context of the problem. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding the connection between force and potential to address subsequent questions about momentum. A review of vector calculus, particularly gradients, is recommended for a deeper understanding.
amb123
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
I have a problem that asks for force in the x-direction on a particle in a potential field given by some function V(x,y,z). The problem asks what the force in the x direction is if the particle starts resting at (1,2,3). I tried reviewing magnetism but found F = B x v where F and v are vectors representative of force and velocity respectively. However, am I to assume some velocity? If the problem is stated as previous am I to assume that it is at rest and that there would be no force if the velocity were zero? In a problem such as this do you assume the particle in question is charged?

I don't want to ask the specifics and give the function because I don't want is solved, but I just wan't to know where my thought processes are misleading me.
The problem also asks for the momentum 10s later, but since I'm having trouble relating force to potential field, I haven't started that part at all.

Thanks for any insight.
-A
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know that if a force field is conservative, it can be written in terms of a scalar function called the potential? (To be precise as the gradient of a scalar function)

Mathematically,

\vec{F} = -\nabla V

In Cartesian space, this is equivalent to the three scalar equations

F_{k} = -\frac{\partial V}{\partial x_{k}}

for k = 1, 2, 3

If you know the potential field, you know the force. If you know the force, you can probably do what you wanted to do.

If you are interested in the theory behind the very first equation of this post, then you might want to look up a text on vector calculus. (This: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient may be useful too).
 
Thanks! I will look into that, I remember gradients from a long time back, I was never terribly great with math and now it is all rusty.

Much appreciated,
-A
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top