Force on a rod attached to a pivot.

  • Thread starter Thread starter albertrichardf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Pivot Rod
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the horizontal force on a pivot of a rod with a weight attached, specifically a 2 kg weight at a height of 0.4 m. The user initially calculated the horizontal force as 9.4 N using the formula W cos ø sin ø, but Feynman's reasoning indicates that the correct horizontal force should be 14.7 N, derived from W tan ø. The user seeks clarification on the discrepancy in their calculations and the origin of the horizontal force on the pivot.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic trigonometry, specifically sine and cosine functions.
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion, particularly forces acting on objects.
  • Knowledge of the concepts of torque and pivot points in physics.
  • Basic understanding of forces in equilibrium conditions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of forces in static equilibrium scenarios.
  • Learn about torque calculations and their applications in physics.
  • Explore Feynman's principles in physics for deeper insights into force analysis.
  • Investigate the relationship between vertical and horizontal forces in systems with pivots.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding forces acting on rods and pivots in static systems.

albertrichardf
Messages
165
Reaction score
11
<Moderator note: Thread moved from Classical Physics, hence no homework template>

Hello.
Can anyone help me confirm the following from the Feynman tips on physics:
View attachment 111741
The above diagram shows two rods, with a weight attached (the square). Each rod has a pivot attached, though the pivot on the left is fixed and cannot roll. The weight is 2 kg, and the rod is 0.5 m long. The question is to find the horizontal force on the right pivot when the weight is 0.4 m from the ground. Both rods exert a force such that the net vertical component balances the weight but for the following pretend that the rod with the moving pivot bears all the weight.

My reasoning is as follows: the weight exerts a vertical force on the rod. Part of this force is parallel to the rod and part is perpendicular. The rod transfers any parallel force to the pivot, and rotates under the effect of the perpendicular force. For our purposes, the perpendicular force can be ignored. The vertical component of the parallel force can also be ignored because that is balanced by the ground. The horizontal component of the parallel force is thus what is being looked for.

The parallel component is W cos ø, where W is the weight of the mass (2 * 9.8) and ø is the angle. The horizontal component is W cos ø sin ø. All this comes from trigonometry. Therefore the total horizontal force is about 9.4 N.However, Feynman reasons that the net force must be parallel to the rod. Because of the weight pushing onto the rod, the rod feels a vertical force, which it exerts on the pivot. The horizontal force on the pivot is also felt by the rod and must be such that the net force is directed parallel to the rod. In other words, the vertical and horizontal forces form right triangle with the net force as the hypotenuse. The horizontal force is then
W tan ø = 14.7

So I got 9.4 but he got 14.7. Can someone explain to me why I am wrong? Also in his explanation, if the rod feels only a vertical force due to the weight, where does the horizontal force on the pivot come from?

Thanks for answering
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Albertrichardf said:
My reasoning is as follows: the weight exerts a vertical force on the rod. Part of this force is parallel to the rod and part is perpendicular. The rod transfers any parallel force to the pivot, and rotates under the effect of the perpendicular force. For our purposes, the perpendicular force can be ignored. The vertical component of the parallel force can also be ignored because that is balanced by the ground. The horizontal component of the parallel force is thus what is being looked for.

The "perpendicular" force has a horizontal component, which cannot be ignored. The rod is not rotating about the pivot.
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/posts/5668969/like see. Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K