Force on wire by earth's mag. field

  • Thread starter Thread starter eroxore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Force Wire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force on a 50-meter long current-carrying wire in Earth's magnetic field, with an inclination angle of 70 degrees. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect force of approximately 2.2 N due to a misunderstanding of the magnetic field components. The correct approach involves using the effective magnetic field, calculated as Bsin(50), leading to the accurate force of 1.9 N. The error was identified as neglecting the perpendicular component of the horizontal magnetic field vector. The importance of correctly determining the effective magnetic field in such calculations is emphasized.
eroxore
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
The task is to calculate the force acting on a 50 meter long current-carrying wire due to Earth's magnetic field. The angle of inclination is assumed to be 70 degrees. Here's a schematic diagram:

3ojZRL.png


The exaggeratedly drawn wire represents a segment of a wire on a power grid. In order to find the force, we need to find the component of Earth's magnetic field perpendicular to the direction of the current in the wire. I began therefore by calculating the vertical component of Earth's magnetic field, yielding B_{vert.} = 50\sin 70^\circ. Let's now redraw the picture with only the vertical component:

3Hy5zD.png


We see now that the perpendicular component of can be calculated as the sin(70) of the vertical component. Thus B_{\perp} = 50\sin 70^\circ \cdot \sin 70^\circ. We can finally use F = IlB to calculate the force and we end up with approximately 2.2 N.

This is however wrong and the actual answer is in fact 1.9 N. The "accepted" approach is to use sin(50) of Earth's magnetic field. I fully understand this, but what I want to unveil is why my approach failed. What exactly was wrong in my arguments? The math or the physics?

Help very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, well as you say, you understand what to do.
You indeed need to use F=BIL, since B_{effective} is Bsin(70-20), B_{effective} is 50μTsin(50)
Putting in the correct values give the correct answer of 1.9 N

Your approach seems a bit odd, you use two times sin(70), I can't figure out which component you want to calculate.
 
Nevermind, I figured out myself why my approach was failing. I forgot to consider the perpendicular component of the horizontal component of Earth's magnetic field vector.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top