Force Resolving Structural Engineering Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Method of Joints to resolve forces in a structural engineering problem. The user seeks clarification on determining the signs of forces and their implications, particularly regarding compressive and tensile forces. They provide calculations for joints A and B, noting that negative values indicate compressive forces while positive values indicate tensile forces. The user expresses confusion about the force at joint B, questioning how it can be zero despite a load on the bridge. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding force equilibrium and the significance of force direction in structural analysis.
The Gradient Guru
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the help but I'm still a little stuck. I can work out the magnitudes fine but I'm a bit confused as to where the negatives should be and what they actually represent. This is my working so far (the joints are labelled A-K from left to right):

Fab = Force along member AB

Consider Joint A:

Sum of Verticals at A=25+Fab*sin60=0
Fab*sin60=-25
Fab=-28.8N

Since this is negative it is a compressive force.

Sum of Horizontals at A=Fab*cos60+Fac=0
-28.88*cos60=-Fac
Fac=14.4N

Since this is positive it is a tensile force.

Consider Joint B (This is where I get confused:

Sum of Verticals at B=Fab*sin60+Fbc*sin60+Fbd*sin0=0
28.88*sin60+Fbc*sin60+0=0
Fbc*sin60=-28.88*sin60
Fbc=-28.88

Since this is negative it is a compressive force.

Sum of Horizontals at B= Fab*cos60-Fbc*cos60+Fbd*cos0=0
28.88*cos60-Fbc*cos60+Fbd=0
-Fbc*cos60+Fbd=-28.88*cos60
Fbd=0N

Have I got all of the negatives right because I really have no idea how they are determined and also, is it even possible for Fbd to have a force of 0N on this bridge given that there is a force of 50N on the center of the bridge?

Thanks for any help.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
814
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
783
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K