Force to accelerate an object downward faster than g

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big Tommy C
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerate Force
AI Thread Summary
To accelerate an object downward faster than gravity, the required acceleration must be calculated by subtracting gravitational acceleration (9.8 m/s²) from the desired acceleration. For an acceleration of 29.67 m/s², the additional force needed is determined by using the formula F = m(a - g), where 'm' is mass and 'a' is the desired acceleration. This approach ensures that the net force applied accounts for both the weight of the object and the additional force required for the desired acceleration. Understanding that the resultant force dictates the acceleration is crucial for accurate calculations. Properly applying these principles allows for effective force determination in various scenarios.
Big Tommy C
Messages
16
Reaction score
6
Hello all.

I am trying to understand the math behind this and keep getting stuck. If I want to accelerate and object downward,lets say 16 inches in 0.1655 seconds , that would be faster acceleration than gravity. I think 29.67 m/s2, so if I calculate force to accelerate at that rate downward, Do I have to subtract 9.8 m/s2 from my acceleration of 29.67 before I calculate the force? IE 29.67-9.8=19.87m/s2 and then I use that acceleration of 19.87 against my mass to determine the force required?

Hoping for some clarification ,Tom
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume the thing is starting from rest and accelerating uniformly, because then you get the ##30 \text{ms}^{-2}## acceleration.

And yes, to determine the additional force you yourself need to apply, you subtract ##g## and multiply by ##m##. That's just because ##F + mg = ma \iff F = m(a-g)##.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, Delta2 and Big Tommy C
Thinking in reverse, in order to accelerate the same mass upwards at a similar rate, you need to add enough extra upwards force to compensate for the downwards force of weight.
The function of that extra force up is only to balance weight: any additional up force will be the only one contributing to up acceleration.

##a=F_{resultant}/mass##

Always think of acceleration as a result of applying a resultant force onto a mass.
 
  • Like
Likes Big Tommy C
Yes Lnewqban I had this question a while back, I appreciate the response.

I was able to derive that by simply adding the weight of the load plus the force required to accelerate it on a vector would give me my final total F requirement.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top