Force to accelerate an object downward faster than g

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big Tommy C
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerate Force
AI Thread Summary
To accelerate an object downward faster than gravity, the required acceleration must be calculated by subtracting gravitational acceleration (9.8 m/s²) from the desired acceleration. For an acceleration of 29.67 m/s², the additional force needed is determined by using the formula F = m(a - g), where 'm' is mass and 'a' is the desired acceleration. This approach ensures that the net force applied accounts for both the weight of the object and the additional force required for the desired acceleration. Understanding that the resultant force dictates the acceleration is crucial for accurate calculations. Properly applying these principles allows for effective force determination in various scenarios.
Big Tommy C
Messages
16
Reaction score
6
Hello all.

I am trying to understand the math behind this and keep getting stuck. If I want to accelerate and object downward,lets say 16 inches in 0.1655 seconds , that would be faster acceleration than gravity. I think 29.67 m/s2, so if I calculate force to accelerate at that rate downward, Do I have to subtract 9.8 m/s2 from my acceleration of 29.67 before I calculate the force? IE 29.67-9.8=19.87m/s2 and then I use that acceleration of 19.87 against my mass to determine the force required?

Hoping for some clarification ,Tom
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume the thing is starting from rest and accelerating uniformly, because then you get the ##30 \text{ms}^{-2}## acceleration.

And yes, to determine the additional force you yourself need to apply, you subtract ##g## and multiply by ##m##. That's just because ##F + mg = ma \iff F = m(a-g)##.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban, Delta2 and Big Tommy C
Thinking in reverse, in order to accelerate the same mass upwards at a similar rate, you need to add enough extra upwards force to compensate for the downwards force of weight.
The function of that extra force up is only to balance weight: any additional up force will be the only one contributing to up acceleration.

##a=F_{resultant}/mass##

Always think of acceleration as a result of applying a resultant force onto a mass.
 
  • Like
Likes Big Tommy C
Yes Lnewqban I had this question a while back, I appreciate the response.

I was able to derive that by simply adding the weight of the load plus the force required to accelerate it on a vector would give me my final total F requirement.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top