Force using relativistic momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the acceleration of a particle under a constant force while considering relativistic momentum. The initial equation presented is based on the relativistic form of momentum, leading to confusion in subsequent steps involving derivatives. Clarification is provided on using the product or quotient rule for differentiation and the importance of simplifying by obtaining a common denominator. The final form of the equation is still a point of confusion for some participants, indicating a need for further assistance in simplification. Overall, the thread emphasizes understanding the application of calculus in relativistic physics.
jk4
[SOLVED] Force using relativistic momentum

I have an example problem in a textbook I'm reading:

"Find the acceleration of a particle of mass m and velocity v when it is acted upon by the constant force F, where F is parallel to v.

then it proceeds to show the solution:

F = \frac{d}{dt}(\gamma mv) = m\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{v}{\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}})

I get all that so far. The next step is where it loses me:

= m[\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^{2}/c^{2}}} + \frac{v^{2}/c^{2}}{(1-v^{2}/c^{2})^{3/2}}] \frac{dv}{dt}

so I don't know how they got there... and then the next step confuses me also. They go from above to here:

= \frac{ma}{(1-v^{2}/c^{2})^{3/2}}

and then of course there a few more steps after that one, but I can get those, I'm just confused about those two steps. Please help clarify it for me, thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first step: Use the product (or quotient) rule for taking a derivative.
The second step: Simplify. Start by getting a common denominator.
 
ah, of course. I see it now. Thank you for the quick reply.
 


I still can't Simplify it to the final form .. can anybody help me with that?? Thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top