Forces acting on a Walking Beam (oil rig pump) from a pivot pin

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the forces acting on a walking beam (beam DEF) at pin E in an oil rig pump system. Participants clarify that while the pin E does not move and therefore does not do work, it does exert horizontal and vertical reactive forces on beam DEF. The motor applies torque at point A on beam AB, and the counterweight applies force at point B, which collectively influence the forces at D and E. For a Free Body Diagram (FBD) of beam DEF, it is essential to represent the reactive forces at E that oppose external forces at D and F, but these forces do not contribute to torque about point E.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of structural analysis principles
  • Familiarity with Free Body Diagrams (FBD)
  • Knowledge of torque and force relationships in mechanical systems
  • Basic concepts of static equilibrium in engineering mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque in static systems
  • Learn about Free Body Diagram techniques for complex structures
  • Explore the mechanics of beams and their reactions to applied forces
  • Investigate the role of pins and supports in structural stability
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, structural analysts, and students studying dynamics and statics in engineering will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focusing on the analysis of forces in mechanical systems.

link223
Messages
70
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
So I just want to see which forc acts on the walking beam at E but itsn't quite obvious to me from the figure.
Relevant Equations
Structural Analysis
So.. question:
- How do I know that only the pin is at work at E and not those 2 beams? my guess: It is because those 2 beams are connected to the pin whilst the pin is the one that exerts a force on that walking beam DEF?

1651004807555.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
link223 said:
Homework Statement:: So I just want to see which forc acts on the walking beam at E but itsn't quite obvious to me from the figure.
Relevant Equations:: Structural Analysis

How do I know that only the pin is at work at E and not those 2 beams?
I have no idea what your question means.
What do you mean by pin E being "at work"? Do you mean it is doing work? It does not move, so it can't do work.
What two beams? DEF is a single beam.

The motor exerts a torque at A on beam AB. In addition, the counterweight exerts a force at B. These result in a force at D, which in turn exerts a torque about E on beam DEF, etc. You do not need to consider forces at E.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: link223
haruspex said:
I have no idea what your question means.
What do you mean by pin E being "at work"? Do you mean it is doing work? It does not move, so it can't do work.
What two beams? DEF is a single beam.

The motor exerts a torque at A on beam AB. In addition, the counterweight exerts a force at B. These result in a force at D, which in turn exerts a torque about E on beam DEF, etc. You do not need to consider forces at E.
Thank you for your answer!
That is indeed what I did (just solved the exercise with this exact method) but on the FBD, there will be a horizontal and vertical force exerted on the beam DEF at E because of that pin.
What i was confused with was whether it is the actual force components from the pin that needs to be drawn or also the forces that replace those two member that connect to E (the ones for stability) which is appearantly not the case.
 
link223 said:
Thank you for your answer!
That is indeed what I did (just solved the exercise with this exact method) but on the FBD, there will be a horizontal and vertical force exerted on the beam DEF at E because of that pin.
What i was confused with was whether it is the actual force components from the pin that needs to be drawn or also the forces that replace those two member that connect to E (the ones for stability) which is appearantly not the case.
You can draw forces at E for completeness, but forces applied at E cannot exert a torque about E. So as long as you use the torque balance about E for your equation you can ignore those forces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: link223
If you are drawing the FBD of beam DEF, pin E should have represented two reactive forces that oppose the two external forces (at D and at F) at that exact frozen instant represented in the picture.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: link223
haruspex said:
You can draw forces at E for completeness, but forces applied at E cannot exert a torque about E. So as long as you use the torque balance about E for your equation you can ignore those forces.
Yes that is indeed what I did (it was for completeness :) ) thank you
 
Lnewqban said:
If you are drawing the FBD of beam DEF, pin E should have represented two reactive forces that oppose the two external forces (at D and at F) at that exact frozen instant represented in the picture.
Thank you that is indeed what I did, I was just confused whether those two member that are connected to E are actually connected to E (the pin) or actually exert some force on DEF directly which is not the case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K