Forces on rotating disk object

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces acting on a rotating disk object, specifically examining the effects of applied forces at different moments in time. Participants explore the implications of these forces on both rotational and translational motion, considering scenarios in a vacuum without gravitational influences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire whether applying a downward force at moment 1 will initiate only rotational motion or also affect the center of mass of the disk.
  • Others question the absence of gravitational forces and the implications of applying forces in a vacuum.
  • Several participants emphasize the need to clarify conditions such as the direction of forces and the fixed position of the center of mass.
  • There are discussions about the nature of the applied force, with some suggesting it may be an impulse, affecting the outcome of translational motion.
  • Some participants argue that if a force is applied at the periphery of the disk, it will lead to translational motion, while others challenge this by referencing conservation of momentum.
  • Concerns are raised about the assumptions made regarding the initial conditions and whether they allow for translational motion to occur.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the effects of previous moments on the current scenario, particularly regarding the initiation of translational motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views on whether translational motion will occur in moment 5 and the conditions necessary for such motion. Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the applied forces and their effects on the disk's motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of defining the nature of the applied forces and the initial conditions, as these factors significantly influence the outcome of the scenario. There is also mention of the need to clarify the role of impulse forces and their practical implications.

  • #61
A.T. said:
- Is the center of mass initially at rest?

- Is the force a short impulse or does it act over a certain period? If the latter, is the direction of the force constant in the inertial frame or in the rotating disk frame?

- Are there any other forces acting?

If there are no other forces, and it is a short impulse, the center of mass will accelerate in the direction of the force. So if it was initially at rest, that's where it will go.
- The center of mass is initially at rest
(There is only rotational motion of the Disk) .
- The force is brief impulse .
- No other forces (only mentioned in the attached picture)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Drakkith said:
Assuming other forces are either absent or negligible, it will move upwards.

Consider the situation in which the disk isn't rotating, but a fast moving object moves upwards and strikes the disk at the point you've circled (or some pegs sticking out, or however you want to apply the force). Assuming the disk is not attached to anything else, the center of mass will move upwards. This is the same situation, just without the rotation, which I don't believe matters at all for your question.
Thank you.

If others also want to give opinion are welcome.
 
  • #63
StoyanNikolov said:
If others also want to give opinion are welcome.
Everyone here is in agreement. If an object that is not translating is subject to an net upward external impulse, it will begin translating upward.

However, I think that many of us are harboring a suspicion that you are being intentionally coy and are hiding an important part of the scenario from view.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, Vanadium 50, nasu and 1 other person
  • #64
StoyanNikolov said:
If others also want to give opinion are welcome.
Um, telling other people what they are and are not welcome to do is more likely to make them angry than anything else.

Further, when discussing rotation, it is not a good idea to use the word "moment" to mean an instant in time.

Now, I count this question being answered no fewer than 8 times - including in a link you yourself provided.. If 8 is not enough, how many more? 15? 32? 64?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and jbriggs444
  • #65
Vanadium 50 said:
Um, telling other people what they are and are not welcome to do is more likely to make them angry than anything else.

Further, when discussing rotation, it is not a good idea to use the word "moment" to mean an instant in time.

Now,, I count this question being answered no fewer than 8 times - including in a link you yourself provided. If 7 is not enough, how many more? 15? 32? 64?
No. It is polite invitation. If you consider yourself angry , please
don't post on this topic.
 
  • #66
StoyanNikolov said:
please
don't post on this topic.
Telling people not to post on "your" topic is not OK.
 
  • #67
Locked pending more moderation. Don't hold your breath.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: StoyanNikolov, berkeman, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • #68
russ_watters said:
Locked pending more moderation. Don't hold your breath.
Thread will remain locked. Any questions, concerns, or comments about this can be directed towards myself or another mentor via a personal message or the report button.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TonyStewart and russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 141 ·
5
Replies
141
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K