Forces that depend only on distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary
Forces that depend solely on distance, such as Coulomb's force, exhibit time-invariant characteristics at specific locations, but the force changes as objects move to new positions. In classical mechanics, the equations of motion remain invariant under changes in inertial reference frames, as demonstrated by Galilean transformations. This invariance applies regardless of whether forces are time-dependent or independent. In relativistic physics, the equations are also covariant under Lorentz transformations, reinforcing that time independence is not a requirement for invariance. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that the fundamental laws of motion maintain their form across different frames of reference.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
It is said that if a force depends only on distance (And not on time), the equations that involve those forces are invariant to a change of the frame of reference...is this true?

Coulomb's force law is only dependent on distance. At a certain space location the force has a value that does not change with time. But after the object is subjected to that force, it moves to a new spatial position and the force on it changes. So there is a change with time...

A time changing source generates a time changing field and therefore a time changing force on an object... what is special about these type of forces? Why don't they fit in the frame of reference transformations? after all, in classical mechanics time is absolute and distance differences are invariant...

thanks,
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
in classical mechanics, motion equations are invariant to changes of inertial reference frame.
Imagine the force acting on a particle given as a function of coordinates and time. Consider two mutually moving frames, with nocoinciding origins O, O'. The coordinates in these frames are related by Galilei transformation, which in the simplest case of two equally oriented coordinated systems and motion od S' along x with velocity v is

<br /> x&#039; = x - vt,<br /> y&#039; = y,<br /> z&#039; = z,<br /> t&#039; = t.<br />

(In general, x,y,z would enter in some linear combinatinons, but t' would be always t). Then in S and S' frames the equations of motion are

<br /> \mathbf F(x,y,z, t) = m\mathbf a(t)~~,~~\mathbf F&#039;(x&#039;,y&#039;,z&#039;, t) = m\mathbf a&#039;(t).<br />

The equations looks the same - every frame use its coordinates to describe the particle, but the form of law is the same. We say that Newton's law of motion is covariant with respect to Galilean transformations coordinates. Furthermore, because frames are inertial, forces are the same

<br /> \mathbf F(x,y,z, t) = \mathbf F&#039; (x&#039;,y&#039;,z&#039;, t).<br />

There is no need to have the time independent force; equations are covariant in general.

In relativistic description (which is closer to reality), the equations are again covariant in respect to, but Lorentz transformation of coordinates, which in our special case is

<br /> x&#039; = \gamma(x - vt),<br /> y&#039; = y,<br /> z&#039; = z,<br /> t&#039; = \gamma(t-vx/c^2).<br />

For example, the law of motion of a particle in EM field is in S

<br /> qF^\mu_{~\nu}(x,y,z,t) u^\nu(t) = m\frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2}(t)<br />

and in S'

<br /> qF&#039;^\mu_{~\nu}(x&#039;,y&#039;,z&#039;,t&#039;) u^\nu(t&#039;) = m\frac{d^2 x&#039;^\mu}{d\tau^2}(t&#039;).<br />

So there is no need to have the time independent force - formulae are invariant with respect to spacetime coordinate transformations in general.

Jano
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K