Forces, vectors and straight lines

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of forces, particularly whether they must act in straight lines or if they can follow curves. Participants explore concepts related to circular forces, tangential forces, and the mathematical representation of these ideas within the context of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the assumption that forces must act in straight lines, suggesting it is merely an observation of nature, as articulated by Newton.
  • Others propose that circular forces act tangentially in a straight line at any given moment, but their direction changes over time.
  • A participant introduces the concept of "ring forces," questioning how these forces behave compared to straight forces.
  • Examples of ring forces are provided, including forces within a heated metal shaft and membrane forces in a balloon under pressure.
  • There is a discussion about whether a circle can be considered an assembly of straight lines or if it has an existence of its own, with some arguing that both circles and straight lines can be viewed as assemblies of points.
  • Participants debate the implications of assigning vectors to points along curves and whether forces can follow such curves.
  • One participant emphasizes that lines, including straight lines and circles, have zero thickness and surface area, suggesting that this property allows for the assignment of vectors.
  • There is a reference to classical physics and the concept of smooth spacetime, indicating a potential connection to the discussion of forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether forces must act in straight lines or if they can follow curves, with no consensus reached on the nature of ring forces or the existence of lines and curves.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved questions about the definitions of forces and their behavior in different contexts, as well as the mathematical representation of these concepts.

Studiot
Messages
5,440
Reaction score
11
Where is it writ that forces must act in straight lines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Studiot said:
Where is it writ that forces must act in straight lines?

It's an observation of nature.
Newton was the first to put it into words.

Actually there's no real reason why an apple would fall straight down from a tree.
It's just that it works best to explain what we see around us.
 
I am aware that we count tangents as straight, but what of ring forces?
 
Magnitude and direction. Direction is a straight line.

Circular forces act in a straight line at any given moment in time (tangential) but that direction changes as a function of time. It's not pushing in all directions at once or it wouldn't go anywhere.
 
Circular forces act in a straight line at any given moment in time (tangential) but that direction changes as a function of time. It's not pushing in all directions at once or it wouldn't go anywhere.

That's my point.
Ring forces act in every direction at once.
 
I've never heard of a ring force, I guess. What is it?
 
A 2D example would be the force within a journal containing a heated metal shaft.
A 3D example would be the membrane force in a balloon under pressure.
 
Each force term acts orthogonal to the membrane surface in a single direction. They're not all one force.
 
They're not all one force.


Why not, there is a continuous force all the way round the circle?

Would you also suggest that a circle is not one line, but an assembly of straight lines?
 
  • #10
Studiot said:
Why not, there is a continuous force all the way round the circle?

Would you also suggest that a circle is not one line, but an assembly of straight lines?

No; in differentation, a circle is an assembly of infinitesimal points.

Yes, continuous, so at each infinitesimal chunk of surface area:
[tex]P = \vec{A} \cdot \vec{F}[/tex]

the surface area vector (the "normal") and the force acting on that that surface have a single direction associated with them.
 
  • #11
1)

No; in differentation, a circle is an assembly of infinitesimal points.

By that reasoning so is a straight (or any other) line.

2)I'm sorry what surface?
 
  • #12
Studiot said:
1)



By that reasoning so is a straight (or any other) line.
Very true.

Studiot said:
2)I'm sorry what surface?

I assume the surface of the balloon that you used as a 3d example.
 
  • #13
I assume the surface of the balloon that you used as a 3d example.

The discussion had moved on to circles by then.

Whilst I'm sure we can regard circles and other lines, for some purposes, as just an assemblage of points I maintain that they have a existence all of their own.

Lines, including straight lines and circles, have zero thickness, zero cross sectional area and zero surface area.

All that has been offered here is to say that we can assign vectors to each point along a curve or across an area.

But for this to be possible, both the curve and area must have an existence separate from and the assigned vectors.

No answer has been offered to the question as to why a force cannot follow such a curve.
 
  • #14
I was referring to the balloon for surface area.

In classical physics, spacetime is "smooth"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K