Form factored of the polynomial discriminant

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bruno Tolentino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the polynomial discriminant and its factored forms for various polynomials. The first example, x² - (a + b)x + (ab), yields a discriminant of a² - 2ab, which factors to (a-b)². The second polynomial, x³ - (a+b+c)x² + (bc+ca+ab)x - (abc), has a discriminant that factors as (b-c)²(c-a)²(a-b)². The third example, x² - 2Ax + B², results in a discriminant of A² - B², factoring to (A+B)(A-B). The final cubic polynomial's discriminant is more complex, and while the formula for its discriminant is referenced, the factorization remains challenging.
Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I wrote x² - (a + b)x + (ab) in the wolfram and polynomial discriminant was: a² - 2ab + b². Factoring: (a-b)²

---

So, I wrote x³ - (a+b+c) x² + (bc+ca+ab) x - (abc) and the polynomial discrimant given was:
31321321321321.png
Factoring: (b-c)² (c-a)² (a-b)²

---

Now, I wrote x² - 2Ax + B² and the polynomial discriminant is: A² - B². Factoring: (A+B)(A-B)

---

At last, but, no minus important, given this polynomial: x³ - 3 A x² + 3 B² x - C³, which is the factored form of the polynomial discriminant?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The formula for the discriminant of a cubic is here. Plug your coefficients into that and see what happens.

I see no reason to expect that an easy factorisation is available. The three preceding examples you gave are all simple. The first two polynomials are just ##(x-a)(x-b)## and ##(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)## respectively, and the third one is only a quadratic. The fourth, about which you ask, is something else entirely.
 
andrewkirk said:
The formula for the discriminant of a cubic is here. Plug your coefficients into that and see what happens.
I know how find it! The problem is the factorization...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top