Form taken by potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the "form" of potential energy refers to the similarity in the equations governing gravitational and electric forces, despite differing constants and variables. Both forces are conservative, leading to potential energy expressions that share a common structure. For gravitational force, the equation is F=Gm1m2/r^2, while for electrostatic force, it is F=Cq1q2/r^2. This similarity means that the calculations for potential energy in both cases follow the same principles. Thus, the potential energy takes a similar mathematical form due to the nature of conservative forces.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
I have come across the following paragraph from my book
"The gravitational force is always attractive .Whereas the electric force is attractive or repulsive acording to whether q0 is negative or positive.Each of the above forces is conservative,so a potential energy is associated with each of them.This potential energy must of course take the same form for both cases."
I want to know which form is it talking about?And why both cases would take the same form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gracy said:
I have come across the following paragraph from my book
"The gravitational force is always attractive .Whereas the electric force is attractive or repulsive acording to whether q0 is negative or positive.Each of the above forces is conservative,so a potential energy is associated with each of them.This potential energy must of course take the same form for both cases."
I want to know which form is it talking about?And why both cases would take the same form?

By "form" they are saying that the equations look exactly the same, except perhaps for the letters that we use to represent the various quantities. For gravity we have Newton's ##F=Gm_1m_2/r^2## and for electrostatic force we have Coulomb's ##F=Cq_1q_2/r^2##. Look at these for a moment and you'll see that ##G## and mass are to the gravitational force equation as ##C## and charge are to the electric force equation; naturally the calculation of the potential energy works the same way for both.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
I got your point.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top