Formal definition of the limit

  • Thread starter Thread starter madah12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit statement using the epsilon-delta definition of limits, specifically for the function as x approaches 2, where the limit is claimed to be 8. Participants are exploring the formal definition and the necessary conditions to establish this limit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss how to find a constant C such that |(x^2 + 2x + 4)| ≤ C for x near 2. There are attempts to relate |x - 2| < 1 to the expression involving C. Some participants question whether C needs to be valid for all x or just for those close to 2.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different methods to establish the relationship between epsilon and delta. Some participants have suggested specific values for delta based on their calculations, while others are questioning the validity of those values and the assumptions made in the process. The discussion remains active with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the epsilon-delta definition and are trying to ensure that their chosen delta values satisfy the limit condition for all x within a specified range. There are mentions of needing to show that for any given epsilon, a corresponding delta can be found, which is a central aspect of the limit proof.

madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


prove the statement using epsilon delta definition of the limit

lim x->2 (x^3)=8

Homework Equations


lim x->a f(x)=L is true when
|f(x)-L|<e
whenever
0< |x-a|<d


The Attempt at a Solution



|x^3 - 8| < e
|(x-2)| |(x^2+2x+4)|<e
x^2+2x+4 has no real roots there for only has one sign f(0)=4 so it is always positive
so |x^2+2x+4|=x^2+2x+4
|(x-2)||(x^2+2x+4)| <C(x-2)<e
where
|(x^2+2x+4)|<C
(x-2) < (e/C) =d

I usually solve most problems like this but I can't find the C
I know that we usually say that d is a small distance so |x-a| <1
|x-2|<1
1<x<3
but then what exactly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
don't you want to find C such that [itex]|(x^2+2x+4)| \leq C[/itex] for all x?
 
yes I am asking how to start that.
also Does it have to be for all x? I mean aslong as I can find a C that works for x that are near two it is enough
 
how can I relate or change |x-2|<1 to something like x^2+2x+4<C?
if I square it
x^2-4x+4<1
x^2+2x+4<1+6x
I will get a variable not a constant
if I cube it
(x-2)(x-2)^2<1
x^2-4x+4<1/(x-2)
x^2+2x+4<6x+ 1/(x-2)
x^2+2x+4< (6x^2-12x+1)/(x-2)
x^3-8<6x^2-12x+1
this goes in rounds too
I don't know If I got this right but if d is less than 1 then the maximum value of x that can be inputted into x^2+2x+4 is 3
and can't I get C to be (6x^2-12x+1)/(x-2) of 3 = 19
so can't I just say that as long as delta <1 and e/19 the limit is true?
Also what I don't understand about these questions are what delta is necessary for it to be true?I mean I just speculated the solution but what does it mean that delta has to be less than e/19?
 
Last edited:
Is it because I didn't show enough work that I don't get any replies?
 
so we need to show that for any given [itex]\epsilon> 0[/itex] we can choose a [itex]\delta > 0[/itex] such that for any x satisfying [itex]|x-2| < \delta[/itex] then

[tex]|x^3 - 8 | < \epsilon[/tex]

so expanding as you have
[tex]|x - 2 |.|x^2+2x+4| < \epsilon[/tex]

now it should be clear (apologies in the other post I put a less than)
[tex]x^2+2x+4 \geq 3[/tex]

thus we have
[tex]3|x - 2 | \leq |x - 2 |.|x^2+2x+4| < \epsilon[/tex]

hopefully you can take it from here
 
another way to do it would be to work in terms of a variable say d, such that [itex]-\delta < d < \delta[/itex], then you can write the limit as

[tex]|(2+d)^3 - 8| < \epsilon[/tex]

expanding that should allow you to solve for d, making the requirerd relation between epsilon & delta clearer
 
3|x-2| <e
|x-2|< e/3
so d = e/3 might work?
or did I get it wrong?
I also tried your other method and got |d^3+6d^2+12d|<e but i don't see anything from it.
 
Last edited:
that'd do it

the other way was
[tex]|(2+d)^3 - 8| < \epsilon[/tex]
[tex]|(2+d)(4+4d +d^2) - 8| < \epsilon[/tex]
[tex]|(8+8d+2d^2+4d+4d^2+d^3) - 8| < \epsilon[/tex]
[tex]|(12d+6d^2+d^3)| < \epsilon[/tex]
[tex]|d| |(12+6d+d^2)| < \epsilon[/tex]
[tex]|d| |(12+6d+d^2)| < \epsilon[/tex]

similarly
[tex]|(12+6d+d^2)| \geq 3[/tex]
 
  • #10
lanedance said:
[tex]|d| |(12+6d+d^2)| < \epsilon[/tex]

We prove that the limit is 2 if - for any epsilon - a value for d is found so that |x^3-8|<epsilon if |x-2|<d. Unfortunately, we have a complicated expression for d. But remember, both epsilon and d are small numbers, much smaller than 1. So 12+6d+d^2 is certainly overestimated by replacing d with 1. So it is quite sure that d= epsilon/19 will do. ehild
 
  • #11
not that it changes the idea, but why go to e/19, when you can show it with the looser constraint e/3?
 
  • #12
To get d you need the stricter constraint.

Just try. Let be e=0.1. What should be d so as |(2+d)^3-8|<e?

If you choose d=0.1/3=0.03333 and calculate 2.03333^3-8 it is
0.4 which is much higher than e=0.1. d=e/12 is much better, but the result is still higher than e.ehild
 
  • #13
yeah apologies, miscalulation on my part
 
  • #14
I did figure what epsilon is but I have problems writing it as a formal proof any hints about that?
 
  • #15
You have to find out d can be if you know epsilon. As the definition of the limit is:

"lim x->a f(x)=L is true when
|f(x)-L|<e
whenever
0< |x-a|<d "

Suppose that |x^3-8| <epsilon, a small number (less that 1)
Show you can find some value for d so that in case |x±2|<d |x^3-8| <epsilon is true.

You choose x the farthest from 2 possible: x=2-d and 2+d. Find out the relation which has to be true between d and epsilon.

ehild
 
  • #16
Given e>0 we choose d =min{1,e/19} such that to show that 0<|x-2|<d whenever |x^3-8|<e
Thus
|x-2||x^2+2x+4|<e
'.' d<1 , |x-2|<d
,', |x-2|<1
.'. -1<x-2<1
.'. 1<x<3
defining f(x) = x^2+2x+4 = (x+1)^2+3
'.' the vertex of the parabola formed by is at x=-1, the function is increasing for all x>-1,.'. f(1)<x<f(3) 7<f(x)<19
7<x^2+2x+4<19(1)
assuming a constant C=19
|x-2|<d
x^2+2x+4 |x-2|<19|x-2|<e
|x-2|<e/19
choose d min ={1,e/19}
e=19d
then for every
0<|x-2|<d
|x-2|x^2+2x+4<19d=19*e/19=e
thus by definition limit x->2 x^3=8
---------------------------------------------
What are the unnecessary details? what should be added or deleted?
or should I do a completely different format?
 
  • #17
madah12 said:
Given e>0 we choose d =min{1,e/19} such that to show that 0<|x-2|<d whenever |x^3-8|<e

It is the opposite: Given arbitrary small e>0 we choose d such that whenever 0<|x-2|<d, |x^3-8|<e. It is all right otherwise.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K