Formula for closest distance to regression line

tnecniv
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
i need to calculate the closest distance of the point that lies closest to the regression
line for my programing but i am not sure what is the formula. maybe someone can help me out here?

thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What are you given..? A set of points and you want to fit them to a straight line?

Without further information I would suggest computing the distance to the line for every point and then taking the minimum.
 
I agree with pere Callahan.

But I really don't see what possible interest such a calculation could have.

After all, you could have points lying ON the line of regression, and still have a very bad approximation.
 
i am trying to find the nearest point to regression line
Having found the regression line, i will need to figure out the point that lies closest to the regression line.

Thanks in advance
 
tnecniv said:
i am trying to find the nearest point to regression line
Having found the regression line, i will need to figure out the point that lies closest to the regression line.

Thanks in advance

Do you know how, in general, to find the distance between a point and a line?

If you do, just make an algorithm to calculate those distances, and pick out that point whose distance is the least.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top