Is There a Formula for Compound Interest with Additional Payments?

AI Thread Summary
A formula for calculating compound interest with additional payments involves using the concept of geometric series. For annual payments of $500 over five years, the total amount can be expressed as a sum of each payment compounded at the annual interest rate. The formula derived shows that the future value of these payments can be calculated as 500*r*(r^5 - 1)/(r - 1), where r is the growth factor per year. This method simplifies the calculation compared to iteratively compounding each payment individually. Understanding this formula allows for more efficient financial planning when making regular contributions.
pdunn
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, I wanted to know is there a formula for compound interest when making additional payments. i.e. I make payments of $500 ever year for 5 years and NOT just $2500 once for the 5 year term.

The current way I am calculating the result is using Compound Interest of initial payment for one year, then use that value as the new payment plus $500 for one year. I continue until 5 years have been reached. Is there a simplier and probably correct way to do this?

Thank you,
P
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can look up "annuity", but you can derive the formula you need if you know a little about geometric series.

Suppose your money grows by r per year, that is you have 500*r a year after your first payment. After 5 years, this first payment becomes 500*r^5. The second payment accumulates 4 years of interest is now at 500*r^4, and so on. At the end of 5 years (and 5 payments total) you have:

500*r^5+500*r^4+500*r^3+500*r^2+500*r=500*r*(r^4+...+1)=500*r*(r^5-1)/(r-1)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top