Calculating Inertia for Changing Speed Engines Connecting Rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaguar57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Inertia
AI Thread Summary
Calculating inertia for a changing speed engine's connecting rod involves understanding the moment of inertia (MMOI) as a constant when treating the rod as a rigid body. The changing speed does not affect the MMOI value, which is determined by the integral of r^2 dm. For kinetic energy calculations, the relevant formula is KE = 0.5 x kg x velocity^2, highlighting the distinction between energy and inertia. Clarifying specific needs is essential for accurate assistance, as uncertainty in requirements complicates the discussion. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effective calculations in engine dynamics.
jaguar57
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Calculating for a section of an engines connecting rod that is always changing speed
I have seen different formulas for inertia. Must be different types.
Since it is changing speed I guess I am looking for the inertia that is against that change.
any help is much appreciated. I know ya'll get a lot of questions on this forum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that you are treating the con rod as a rigid body, the MMOI is simply a constant, the integral of r^2 dm. Changing speed has no impact on the MMOI value.
 
I think maybe the formula I need is the one that includes velocity which is
KE= .5 x kg x velocity^2
 
Energy an inertia are different things. We can't tell what you need.
 
  • Like
Likes Dr.D
If you don't know what you need, it will be very difficult for anyone else to help you because we don't know either.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top