Formulae for calculating the area of a quadrilateral non-cyclic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bruno Tolentino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Formulae
Click For Summary
Calculating the area of a non-cyclic quadrilateral requires six values: the lengths of the four edges and the lengths of the two diagonals. A formula that only uses the four edge lengths is insufficient, as demonstrated by examples where the same edge lengths can yield different areas based on the shape's configuration. Testing with software like GeoGebra confirms that the simplified formula does not produce accurate results. The discussion emphasizes that both diagonals are necessary to account for the quadrilateral's shape. Accurate area calculation must consider the arrangement of the vertices and the diagonals involved.
Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I want knows if a formula for calculate the area of a quadrilateral non-cyclic needs of just four values (the values of the four edges) or if is necesseray 6 values (the values of the four edges MORE os values of the two diagonals)?

This formula needs of 6 values (a,b,c,d,p,q):
1a04d408f073f30a1edd47b9f4501566.png


OBS: s = (a+b+c+d)/2

And this formula needs of just 4 (a,b,c,d):
3227d258f1f0437e6cad6f6000c9c479.png


But, I tested this second formula in the geogebra and it don't works...

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trapezoid#Area
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrilateral#Non-trigonometric_formulas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretschneider's_formula#Related_formulas
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The four edges are obviously not sufficient. Start with a square (side length=1) - area =1. Now take a pair of diagonally opposite corners and move them toward each other, while keeping the side lengths constant. When they meet, the resultant quadrilateral area = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Bruno Tolentino
And 4 sides and 1 diagonal is not sufficient either. Consider a shape with sides 1, 1, 0.8, 0.8 in that order. Now the 0.8 v can be inside, or outside (convex or concave) with the area different.
 
  • Like
Likes Bruno Tolentino
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K