Formulae for calculating the area of a quadrilateral non-cyclic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bruno Tolentino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Formulae
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the area of a non-cyclic quadrilateral requires six values: the lengths of the four edges and the lengths of the two diagonals. A formula that only uses the four edge lengths is insufficient, as demonstrated by examples where the same edge lengths can yield different areas based on the shape's configuration. Testing with software like GeoGebra confirms that the simplified formula does not produce accurate results. The discussion emphasizes that both diagonals are necessary to account for the quadrilateral's shape. Accurate area calculation must consider the arrangement of the vertices and the diagonals involved.
Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I want knows if a formula for calculate the area of a quadrilateral non-cyclic needs of just four values (the values of the four edges) or if is necesseray 6 values (the values of the four edges MORE os values of the two diagonals)?

This formula needs of 6 values (a,b,c,d,p,q):
1a04d408f073f30a1edd47b9f4501566.png


OBS: s = (a+b+c+d)/2

And this formula needs of just 4 (a,b,c,d):
3227d258f1f0437e6cad6f6000c9c479.png


But, I tested this second formula in the geogebra and it don't works...

Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trapezoid#Area
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrilateral#Non-trigonometric_formulas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretschneider's_formula#Related_formulas
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The four edges are obviously not sufficient. Start with a square (side length=1) - area =1. Now take a pair of diagonally opposite corners and move them toward each other, while keeping the side lengths constant. When they meet, the resultant quadrilateral area = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Bruno Tolentino
And 4 sides and 1 diagonal is not sufficient either. Consider a shape with sides 1, 1, 0.8, 0.8 in that order. Now the 0.8 v can be inside, or outside (convex or concave) with the area different.
 
  • Like
Likes Bruno Tolentino
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top