Fourier Representation of Simple Half-Wave Rectifier

cj
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
I, in fact, know the correct Fourier representation
for the following (it was given to me):

f(t)=0 \text { if } -\pi \leq \omega t \leq 0

and

f(t)=sin(\omega t) \text { if } 0 \leq \omega t \leq \pi

\hrule

I'm curious about the derivation that led to it -- specifically how the coefficients were derived.

I know, in general...

A_0=\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(x)dx

A_N=\frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(x)cos(nx)dx

B_N=\frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi}f(x)sin(nx)dx

... but am stuck when it comes to setting-up the
integrals (substitution rules, how integrals might be broken-up into sub-integrals, intervals, etc.)

Comments?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You understand that multipication by that f(x) is equivalent to simply changing the limits of integration from [-pi, pi] to [0, pi] right.

For the integral of sin(x) sin(nx) and sin(x) cos(nx) just use integration by parts (twice) using sin(x) = d/dx(-cos x) etc, this gets you the original integral on both LHS and RHS which makes it easy to solve.

For example with the sine series integral this gets you something like I = n^2 I, (where I is the integral you're trying to find). This of course tells you that either n=1 or I = 0 and indeed the sine series coefficient are all zero except for the first one (n=1). The exact same procedure will work for the cosine coeficients and this time give a non trivial series.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top