Quantum Physics 2nd Year Exam Help: Understanding Fourier Series

robgb
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I have a quantum physics 2nd year undergraduate exam in a few weeks, I'm a complete beginner to Fourier series, can anyone help explain how to answer this question please? Thanks, rob.

The question is http://mobilecrazy.net/fourier.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (a), you use an identity for the integral of a product of two trigonometric functions over a whole number multiple of the period. This is called the orthogonality condition, or orthogonality integral.

For part (b), you use this result from part (a) and and the orthogonality idea to solve it.
 


Hi Rob,

First of all, don't worry if you are a complete beginner to Fourier series. It may seem intimidating at first, but with some practice and understanding, you will be able to tackle this question and any other related questions on your exam.

Fourier series is a mathematical tool used to represent periodic functions as a combination of sine and cosine functions. In simple terms, it breaks down a complex function into simpler components. This is particularly useful in quantum physics as many physical phenomena are periodic in nature.

Now, let's take a closer look at the question you have provided. The question asks you to find the Fourier series for the given function f(x) = x on the interval [-π, π]. The first step in answering this question is to understand the formula for a Fourier series. It is given by:

f(x) = a0/2 + ∑(n=1 to ∞) [an cos(nx) + bn sin(nx)]

where a0, an, and bn are known as the Fourier coefficients. These coefficients can be calculated using the following formulas:

a0 = (1/π) ∫[-π, π] f(x) dx

an = (1/π) ∫[-π, π] f(x) cos(nx) dx

bn = (1/π) ∫[-π, π] f(x) sin(nx) dx

Now, let's apply these formulas to the given function f(x) = x. First, we need to calculate the Fourier coefficient a0. Using the formula, we get:

a0 = (1/π) ∫[-π, π] x dx = 0

Next, we need to calculate the coefficients an and bn. Since f(x) = x is an odd function, all the even terms (cosine terms) will be equal to 0. Therefore, we only need to calculate the odd coefficients. Using the formulas, we get:

an = 0 for all n (since f(x) = x is an odd function)

bn = (1/π) ∫[-π, π] x sin(nx) dx = (2/πn) [1 - cos(nπ)]

Now, we have all the coefficients and we can write the Fourier series for f(x) = x as:

f(x) = ∑(n=1 to ∞) [(2/πn) [1 - cos(nπ)] sin
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top