Fourier series odd and even functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the representation of odd functions in Fourier series. It is stated that all odd functions can be described by sine series, yet the provided equation includes cosine terms, leading to contradictions. The participants clarify that if the function is defined as sin(φ/2) over [0, 2π], it is treated as even, while defining it over [-π, π] would make it odd. There is also uncertainty about the necessity of the term c^n in the series, with suggestions that it may not serve a purpose. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying the function's symmetry and interval for accurate Fourier series representation.
sommerfugl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello

I'am a little confused. In my textbook it is written that all odd function can be described by a sine series.

I have this following equation from an exercise:

A_{0}+\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty (A_{n} cos(n \phi) + B_{n} sin(n \phi))c^{n} = sin(\dfrac{\phi}{2})

It's a standard Fourier serie, where n and c is positive. T
hen it is written in the solution that B_{n}c^{n} = 0 because of symmetry reasons. And I'am confused because then the Fourier serie only have cosine term and the function on the right hand side is an odd function?!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Off hand I would say you are right. For an odd function the A's should be 0, not the B's. Also if c is a constant, what is the point of cn, since the direct calculation of the coefficients doesn't give them.
 
When you find the Fourier series, you are taking the function to be periodic with period 2\pi.

I think your book is taking the function as \sin \phi/2 on the interval [0, 2\pi] and extending it to be periodic for other values of \phi. That is an even function.

If you defined the function as \sin \phi/2 over the interval [-\pi, \pi], that is a different function which is odd.

It could be that the book forgot to say which of these functions it is talking about.

I agree with #2, I don't see the purpose the c^n (or for c_n, if there was a typo).
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top