Understanding Fourier Transforms: Solving Confusion with Even Functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the Fourier Transform of the function f(t) defined as 1 - |t| for |t| < 1 and 0 for |t| > 1. The original poster successfully computed the Fourier transform using the integral method but is confused about using the Fourier cosine transform due to the function being even. Other participants confirm that the Fourier cosine transform can be applied, but they cannot identify the discrepancy in the results without seeing the original calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of sharing detailed work to resolve confusion in mathematical problems. Overall, the forum emphasizes collaboration in understanding Fourier transforms and their applications.
engcon
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, I got a problem in which I have to find the Fourier Transform of a function f(t) defined:

f(t) = { 1 - |t|, |t| < 1
0, |t| > 1 }

Well , I found the Fourier transform by working out the integral f(t)e^(-iwt) with the limits being -inf to +inf (and I got the right answer).

Now, since f(t) is an even function, does that mean I can use the Fourier cosine transform?

I tried to work it out and got a different answer, and basically I'm confused? :frown:

Any help is appreciated, thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yeah i have the same problem here!
 
Yes, the function is even, and so you can use the Fourier cosine transform. However, since you've not posted your solution, I can't see why you're getting a different answer.

eng_pro said:
yeah i have the same problem here!

Your user-name is very similar to the OP's. Coincidence?
 
yes i did it

i used: Fcosine = 2*int (1-t) cos (wt) dt from 0 to1
 
yep it is coincidence..i don't know the OP's username k
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top