Fourier transform of a modified impulse train

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the Fourier Transform of a modified impulse train defined by x(t)=∑((-1)^{n}δ(t-nT)). The user breaks down the impulse train into contributions from even and odd indexed impulses, leading to the expression x(t)=∑δ(t-2nT) - ∑δ(t-(2n+1)T). The Fourier Transform is derived using known transforms, resulting in X(jω)=∑δ(ω-πn/T)[1-(-1)^{n}]. The user seeks verification of their solution and requests references for non-uniform sampling and reconstruction. The final answer is confirmed correct by a peer.
naimad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need to find the Fourier Transform (FT) of:

x(t)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}((-1)^{n}\delta(t-nT))

Not really sure how to solve this problem, so any help will be appreciated.

Also, if you guys know a good reference for non-uniform sampling and reconstruction, please post it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
naimad said:
I need to find the Fourier Transform (FT) of:
x(t)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}((-1)^{n}\delta(t-nT))

Note: I think my answer below is correct, but I've never found a way to check my answers when finding the FT... So, if someone with more experience could verify this, I would appreciate it!

Notice first that all the impulses at odd values of n are being subtracted, while all the impulses at even values of n are being added. This suggests that we write x(t) as follows:

x(t)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta(t-2nT) - \sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta(t-(2n+1)T)

=\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta(t-2nT) - \sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta(t-2nT-T)

Now let

\hat{x}(t) = \sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta(t-2nT)

This is a standard impulse train with period 2T. From any table of basic Fourier Transforms:

\hat{X}(j\omega) = \frac{2\pi}{2T}\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta\left(\omega-\frac{2\pi n}{2T}\right) = \frac{\pi}{T}\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta\left(\omega-\frac{\pi n}{T}\right)

Now notice that x(t), above, can be written as:

x(t)=\hat{x}(t)-\hat{x}(t-T)[/itex]<br /> <br /> We already know the Fourier transform for \hat{x}(t); now we just need to use the time shifting property to find the transform for \hat{x}(t-T):<br /> <br /> FT \{\hat{x}(t-T)\} = e^{-j\omega T}\hat{X}(j\omega)<br /> <br /> Now, by linearity:<br /> <br /> X(j\omega)=\hat{X}(j\omega)-e^{-j\omega T}\hat{X}(j\omega)&lt;br /&gt; =\hat{X}(j\omega)[1-e^{-j\omega T}]<br /> <br /> And since we are dealing with an impulse train, the only values of \omega we have to deal with are those at:<br /> <br /> \omega=\frac{\pi n}{T} (since the impulse will be 0 everywhere else).<br /> <br /> From this we can write:<br /> <br /> e^{-j\omega T}=e^{-j\pi n }=(-1)^n<br /> <br /> So our final answer will be:<br /> <br /> <br /> X(j\omega)=\frac{\pi}{T}\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}\delta\left(\omega-\frac{\pi n}{T}\right)[1-(-1)^n]
 
Last edited:
Thanks WolfOfTheSteps, I checked it out with a friend and it seems to be correct.

Still, if anybody knows a good reference for non-uniform sampling and reconstruction, please post it.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top