Fraunhofer diffraction and convolution of two aperture functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the convolution of two aperture functions in the context of Fraunhofer diffraction. The user seeks clarification on calculating the transmission function for a cosine aperture function illuminated by three slits. The correct approach involves convolving the Fourier transforms of the cosine aperture function and a rectangular function, resulting in a Sinc function that captures the diffraction pattern. The aperture function can be expressed as cos²(x) * rect(x/3), leading to a far-field diffraction pattern represented by the convolution of FT(cos²) and FT(rect(x/3)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fraunhofer diffraction principles
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms and their applications
  • Familiarity with aperture functions, specifically cosine and rectangular functions
  • Basic concepts of convolution in signal processing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier transforms in optics
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of convolution
  • Explore the physical implications of Sinc functions in diffraction patterns
  • Investigate the role of aperture functions in wave optics
USEFUL FOR

Optics researchers, physicists, and engineering students focusing on wave phenomena and diffraction analysis.

Blairo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm having some trouble understanding the concept of two function convolution in Fraunhofer diffraction.

Let's say I have an aperture function in the shape of some cosine function (which is always above zero), and I want to calculate the transmission function if I only illuminate 3 such "slits" (so I capture 3 peaks of cosine aperture function). In order to do that, I was told to take the convolution of two Fourier transforms: the transmission function of cosine aperture illuminated over infinite slits and the transmission function of the Rect. function (some kind of box, which captures the 3 peaks of cosine function), which is a Sinc. function.

Is this correct? I don't quite get the physical meaning of convolution in this particular case.

Thanks for any explanations.
 
Science news on Phys.org
If I understand you correctly, the aperture function could be written as something like cos^2(x)*rect(x/3). Assuming I kept track of the scale factors correctly, this means that 3 cycles of cos^2 (which is always positive) are illuminated.

Then, the far-field diffraction pattern is the FT of the aperture function, which would be FT(cos^2) convolved with FT(rect(x/3)), or:

(1/2 Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta[-2 + u] + Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta +
1/2 Sqrt[\[Pi]/2] DiracDelta[2 + u])**Sinc[3u],

where DiracDelta[a+u] is a delta function located at u = -a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K