Free body diagram from whole system-direction of forces in free-body d

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on creating free body diagrams (FBDs) for a car and trailer system on an 8-degree incline. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly positioning forces, particularly joint forces, in the FBDs. It is established that internal joint forces should not be included in the whole system diagram, but must be represented in the individual FBDs of the car and trailer. The use of D'Alembert's principle is mentioned, highlighting the need for clarity when incorporating fictitious forces in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free body diagrams (FBDs)
  • Knowledge of D'Alembert's principle
  • Familiarity with dynamic equilibrium concepts
  • Basic mechanics of inclined planes and friction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the construction of free body diagrams for multi-body systems
  • Learn about the application of D'Alembert's principle in dynamics
  • Research the effects of rolling friction on inclined planes
  • Explore the concept of internal vs. external forces in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering courses, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as professionals involved in vehicle dynamics and mechanical design.

marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A car and a trailer are connected by a joint. The car and trailer system are on a inclined place at a gradient of 8 degrees. The rolling friction coefficient along with other vehicle parameters are given.We are asked to draw the free body diagrams of the car and trailer separately and thereby find the forces at the joint.


Homework Equations


Splitting the car-trailer system into 2 separate free body diagrams.


The Attempt at a Solution


I am finding difficulty as to how I should position the forces in the free-body diagram.I have made a logical guess in the solution attached as I assume there is 'dynamic equilibrium'(just as is taken in the D'alembert principle). Am I right in the way I have shown the direction of the joint forces? Can it be done in the exact reverse sense and still be correct?

In the whole system diagram,it does make sense for the joint forces to be so as the joint sags downwards and is pulled forward.
 

Attachments

  • 0899_001.jpg
    0899_001.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 653
Physics news on Phys.org
marellasunny said:

Homework Statement



A car and a trailer are connected by a joint. The car and trailer system are on a inclined place at a gradient of 8 degrees. The rolling friction coefficient along with other vehicle parameters are given.We are asked to draw the free body diagrams of the car and trailer separately and thereby find the forces at the joint.


Homework Equations


Splitting the car-trailer system into 2 separate free body diagrams.


The Attempt at a Solution


I am finding difficulty as to how I should position the forces in the free-body diagram.I have made a logical guess in the solution attached as I assume there is 'dynamic equilibrium'(just as is taken in the D'alembert principle). Am I right in the way I have shown the direction of the joint forces? Can it be done in the exact reverse sense and still be correct?

In the whole system diagram,it does make sense for the joint forces to be so as the joint sags downwards and is pulled forward.
In the whole system diagram, do not show the joint forces because they are internal to the system. Only show the external forces like traction friction force forward on the driving wheels, rolling friction on the trailer wheel, and weights. When you draw FBDs of the trailer and car, then include the joint forces which are drawn correctly. Do not include fictitious DAlembert forces in the FBD, however,it may be useful to do so by inserting the fictitious inertial force -ma at the cg and summing forces and torques equal to 0, but if so doing, label your diagram as "FBD with ficticious forces".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K