Free Electron Model: Success & Metallic Density of States

Cheetox
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi,
In a lot of places it states that one of the great successes of the free electron model is that it gives, more or less, the metallic density of states, I understand that if you do the maths for a fermi gas you end up with a density of states = 3N/2Ef, but to what value do we compare this answer to say that the free electron model has been a success?
cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cheetox said:
Hi,
In a lot of places it states that one of the great successes of the free electron model is that it gives, more or less, the metallic density of states, I understand that if you do the maths for a fermi gas you end up with a density of states = 3N/2Ef, but to what value do we compare this answer to say that the free electron model has been a success?
cheers

Your question here is a bit confusing. Are you asking about the free electron model in general, or the validity of the free electron density of states in particular? The free electron model is roughly the starting basis of the Drude model, and that produces a whole slew of properties, such as Ohm's law, that have been used successfully.

Zz.
 
yeah I'm asking more about the validity of the free electron density of states model,
cheers
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top