Free Fall Question (Non-solvable 2nd order equation)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a ball thrown vertically upward from a tower. The original poster seeks to understand the time it takes for the ball to pass the edge of the tower when the reference point for height is set at the ground level, rather than at the top of the tower.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the applicability of a kinematic equation when changing the reference point for height. They express concern about potential energy considerations and the implications of using a ground-level reference. Other participants suggest modifying the equation to account for the new reference point and clarify the use of initial position in kinematic equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and the implications of changing the reference point for height. Some guidance has been offered regarding the adjustment of the kinematic equation, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has a solution from a book but is seeking clarification on the reasoning behind the choice of reference point. There is an emphasis on not using energy concepts in the solution process.

phys_student1
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This is from "3000 solved problems in physics". Yes, I have the solution but
I still have a question.

a ball is thrown vertically upward with a velocity of 20 m/s from a top of a tower
having height of 50m. On its return it misses the tower and finally hits the ground.


What time t elapses from the moment the ball is thrown until it passes the edge of the tower?

The book solution is clear, it chooses y=0 to be at the top of the tower.
Then: y=vot + (1/2)at2
This is solved to give t=0 (the beginning) or t=4.08s.

OK, nice, but I'd like the y-axis to be at the ground. Clearly, I cannot apply the above equation,
because it will neglect the additional potential energy that the ball have when now it's 50m above
the y axis. (If I substituted 50 for y in the eqn, I'll get a non-solvable eqn, or, if you like, an imaginary solution).

So how can we solve this (without using the concept of energy) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking y= 0 at the bottom of the tower means each point will have "y" 50 higher than before- that will give you y= v_0t+ (1/2)at^2+ 50. And, since the problem asks for the time the ball passes the tower again, you want to know when the ball will again have height 50. That is, you want to solve
y= v_0t+ (1/2)at^2+ 50= 50

Subtract 50 from each side and you have exactly the same equation as before.
 
Just to add to what Halls' explained:
ali8 said:
Then: y=vot + (1/2)at2
This equation assumes that y = 0 at t = 0. A more general equation would have an arbitrary initial position y0:
y = y0 + v0t + (1/2)at2
 
Thanks a lot !

Yes, I should have used (delta y), rather than (y).

Many thanks again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K