Free fall with + and - Vinitial

AI Thread Summary
Two objects are thrown from a cliff, one with a positive initial velocity (upward) and the other with a negative initial velocity (downward). The discussion centers on whether the object thrown upward reaches a greater height and thus has a larger final velocity (vf) upon hitting the ground due to a longer duration under gravity. It is pointed out that the initial velocities must be considered when calculating vf, as they influence the overall motion. The upward-thrown object will eventually return to the cliff's height, raising questions about its velocity at that point. Ultimately, the calculations of final velocities depend on both the initial velocities and the heights reached.
Gerstemeier
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Two objects thrown from a cliff. One with + vinitial (upward) One with - vinitial (downward). Does the one with + vinitial not reach a greater height and thus have a larger vf upon hitting the ground since it falls farther and therefore is subject to gravity longer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gerstemeier said:
thus have a larger vf upon hitting the ground since it falls farther and therefore is subject to gravity longer?
Yes. perhaps your argument is correct but check their initial velocities (from which they start falling under gravity) and then calculate Vf... then you may be wrong!
 
Gerstemeier said:
Two objects thrown from a cliff. One with + vinitial (upward) One with - vinitial (downward). Does the one with + vinitial not reach a greater height and thus have a larger vf upon hitting the ground since it falls farther and therefore is subject to gravity longer?
If you throw an object upward from the top of the cliff, it will normally come back down again. When it does so and is level with the top of the cliff, what is its velocity then?
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top