Free particle in one dimension

angass
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I´m not sure if my way of tackling a question, probably it's a trivial problem, but it's important for me to get it right so any help will be greeted.
The question is as follows:

Problem: consider a particle in a one-dimensional system. The wave function ψ(x) is as follows:
ψ(x)= 0 for (-∞<x<0),
ψ(x)= 1/√a for (0<x<a)
ψ(x)= 0 for (a<x<∞)

i) if the kinetic energy is measured what is the most probable value?
ii) which values of the momentum can never be found when measuring it?

My reasoning:
i) I use the operator for kinetic energy: K= -\frac{h^2}{2m}\frac{∂^2}{∂x^2}
which when applied: ∫ψ(x)*Kψ(x)dx gives me zero.
If this was right I assume the most probable value of the kinetic energy is zero.
ii) I have no clue whatsoever what the question means.

Thanks and forgive my bad english, regards from Spain!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi angass, welcome to PF!

angass said:
The wave function ψ(x) is as follows:
ψ(x)= 0 for (-∞<x<0),
ψ(x)= 1/√a for (0<x<a)
ψ(x)= 0 for (a<x<∞)
Is that correct? Because this is not a continuous function, and therefore not a valid wave function.
 
This looks suspiciously like a griffiths or leibowitz homework problem...

You want to take express psi(x) in a Fourier basis (as a sum of e^i(kx-wt)). Doing the Fourier transform will be a simple integral from 0 to a with 1/a^1/2 as a constant.

i) You're forgetting the edges at 0 and a. The derivative is not zero there. Once you express this function as Fourier expansion, you'll see you don't get zero anymore.

ii) apply the definition of p = i hbar d/dx to the Fourier transform. The answer should drop out. I expect some of the coefficients for specific k terms in the Fourier transform will be zero. (the Fourier basis is an eigen value of the momentum and kinetic energy operator)
 
rigetFrog said:
This looks suspiciously like a griffiths or leibowitz homework problem...

Same here mate.

To the OP if it is we have a homework section.

But if it isn't - Google is your friend eg:
http://www.colorado.edu/physics/TZD/PageProofs1/TAYL07-203-247.I.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top