Free Worldwide Energy - Nichola Tesla

  • Thread starter Thread starter onycho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Tesla
AI Thread Summary
Nikola Tesla proposed that the Earth could conduct electricity, allowing for the extraction of free energy from any point on its surface. He believed this could be achieved by charging the Earth from a single location, enabling unlimited energy access for everyone. However, the inability to meter this free energy led to its suppression by governments and industries benefiting from conventional energy sources. Tesla's experiments demonstrated the potential of using the Earth as a conductor, yet his ideas remain largely unrecognized and misunderstood. The discussion highlights the irony of Tesla's visionary concepts being overshadowed by monetary interests in energy.
  • #51
Originally posted by onycho
Russ I often wonder where you come by your certainty of information and knowledge about Nikola Tesla and his crackpot inventions?
I think you misunderstood me - Tesla cannot be considered a crackpot on the basis of inventions that other people erroneously attribute to him. The conspiracy theorist who attributes a city-wide blackout, an explosion over Tunguska, or an energy weapon to Tesla is the crackpot.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #52
onycho
here's a character 'inspired' by Tesla
one of the 'virtualy 'unknown'

http://www.rexresearch.com/moray2/morayrer.htm
Chapter 7

The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth Floats*

[* Nature of World & of Man, Chicago Inst. of Technology]

by
Dr T. Henry Moray. S. Sc.

[This was the original Chapter 1 in a book called Beyond the Light Rays, which is out-of -print and no longer available. The last known copy was stolen from Dr moray's laboratory…]
A New Era In Energy: Power from the Cosmos and the Earth.

Dr Nikola Tesla said over 60 years ago: "Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point if the universe… throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic --- and this we know it is, for certain --- then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature."**

[** Nikola Tesla: Experiments with Alternating Currents of High Potential & High Frequency, 1904]

Nikola Tesla was not referring to atomic or nuclear energy, but to the energy which is continually bombarding the Earth from outer space.

Enough energy is coming to the Earth to light over 1.5 million (1,693,600) 100-watt lamps for every human being on the Earth today. No fuel of any kind need be taken as a dead load as this energy can be "picked-up" directly by ocean liners, railroads, airplanes, automobiles, or any form of transportation. Heat, light and power can be made available for use in all kinds of buildings and for all kinds of machinery. An example would be to pump water onto the desert lands, the power source being only a fraction of the weight of any steam plant or any kind of engine in use today and all this at a fraction of the current cost.

A wild dream? No! It's a proven practical reality, as hundreds of people know who have witnessed the Moray Radiant Energy invention --- powered from the cosmos. This is cosmic energy. ***

[*** Dr Moray was not referring to Cosmic Rays. One must read further and contemplate his hypothesis regarding energy from within the atom.]

=====
anyway, you may find this interesting
and curiously
" 161] The original patent application was first filed in 1931. This application was rejected on a number of bases. First (Figure 17),_ "Because no means was provided for causing the cathode to emit an appreciable number of electrons, the current produced in the cathode by the antenna will not heat the cathode to a temperature at which an appreciable number of electrons per second are emitted"_ (In other words, according to Thomas E. Robinson, Commissioner of Patents, a solid state device, a transistor, cannot possible work). Second, because "No natural source of electric wave energy is known to the Examiner and proof of the existence of such a source is required". In other words, it was not enough for Moray to demonstrate the effect of the energy source; he also had to identify it, which he could not do…

[p. 190] In fact, we have recently been informed that none of the original patent applications that Henry made are any longer available at the US Patent Office. Although their file jackets are there, the contents and applications themselves are gone…"
=====
I've been to the 'Patent Office' (Crystal City)-would have been very easy to have taken anything----i'm guessing, but i doubt they'll let 'ordinary citizenz' do their own 'research' these days...
 
  • #53
Originally posted by russ_watters
I think you misunderstood me - Tesla cannot be considered a crackpot on the basis of inventions that other people erroneously attribute to him. The conspiracy theorist who attributes a city-wide blackout, an explosion over Tunguska, or an energy weapon to Tesla is the crackpot.

Russ I must have misunderstood you as I do agree with your assertions that many have given Tesla credit for undocumented things or events that could not have happened as a result of his work.

What he actually did was significant but he died a pauper because of the greed so notable in the character flaws of many as we see today.
 
  • #54
Originally posted by mouseonmoon

here's a character 'inspired' by Tesla
one of the 'virtualy 'unknown'...

Yes I believe that there are things yet unknown to be discovered such as abundant energy for all mankind's purposes. If Einstein's famous formula (E=mc>2)is valid, all matter is nothing more than condensed energy. The challenge is to convert, store and use this universal energy safely unlike nuclear power sources.

The mere fact that Tesla's original patents are missing from the US Patent Office while patent copies do exist on-line indicates that someone was very interested in his copious works shortly after his death in 1943. Such infringement of Tesla's patents by others is common but in his case, there were no relatives to fight for his genius.
 
  • #55
I personally think that Tesla was a crackpot. Now I didn't personally know the man, and what I form my opinions on are the writings and descriptions of others. But, there is always SOME truth to be found in such writings. The latter day crackpots that worship Tesla probably worship him because he really did have some wacked out ideas. His wierdness may just have been exaggerated by all of the Tesla worshipping fools, but I still believe he was a bit off kilter.
 
  • #56
Originally posted by Averagesupernova

I personally think that Tesla was a crackpot. Now I didn't personally know the man, and what I form my opinions on are the writings and descriptions of others. But, there is always SOME truth to be found in such writings. The latter day crackpots that worship Tesla probably worship him because he really did have some wacked out ideas. His wierdness may just have been exaggerated by all of the Tesla worshipping fools, but I still believe he was a bit off kilter.

Yep that is exactly what many believed about Albert Einstein and Marie Curie. They were considered crackpots, had their share of worshipping idols and of course they both were a bit off kilter.

Only later when Tesla's ideas are found in almost everything the world's population uses each day, many forget that they were his ideas and concepts which were stolen from this very human being.
 
Back
Top