Uncovering the Truth Behind the First $350 Billion of the TARP Bailout

  • News
  • Thread starter Skyhunter
  • Start date
  • Tags
    watch
In summary, a conservative legal group is suing to reveal how the first $350 billion of the financial services bailout was spent. The Obama administration has promised to make the second part of TARP more transparent, but the lack of transparency in the past is concerning and could lead to negative consequences for everyday citizens.
  • #1
Skyhunter
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/conservative-group-sues-for-tarp-details-2009-02-16.html

A conservative legal group is suing the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve to reveal exactly how the first $350 billion of the financial services bailout was spent.

Hopefully this will be informative.

The Obama administration has promised to put the second part of TARP on the web.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
lack of transparency is slowly taking America towards an authoritarian regime... average joes like us have the most to lose (and not just in terms of wealth)...
 
  • #3
Skyhunter said:
Hopefully this will be informative.

I wouldn't expect much from the Bush administration. I think they practiced poor record keeping so as to allow them to be unaccountable.

That's the way Cheney and Rove liked to roll.
 

1. What is the purpose of "Freedom Watch Sues Over TARP"?

"Freedom Watch Sues Over TARP" is a lawsuit filed by the organization Freedom Watch against the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). TARP was a government program created in 2008 to provide financial assistance to banks and other financial institutions during the financial crisis.

2. Who is involved in the lawsuit?

The lawsuit was filed by Freedom Watch, a conservative political organization, against the United States Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve. The defendants in the case are the Secretary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board.

3. What is the basis of the lawsuit?

The lawsuit claims that TARP is unconstitutional because it gives the government too much power over private companies and violates the Fifth Amendment, which protects against the taking of private property without just compensation. Freedom Watch also argues that TARP has allowed the government to take over and control private companies, which goes against the principles of a free market economy.

4. What is the current status of the lawsuit?

The lawsuit was originally filed in 2009 and has been through several appeals and motions. In 2019, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, leaving the lower court's ruling in place. The lower court had dismissed the case, stating that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue.

5. What is the potential impact of this lawsuit?

If the lawsuit were to be successful, it could have a significant impact on the government's ability to intervene in the private sector during times of economic crisis. It could also set a precedent for future cases involving government intervention in the economy. However, as the case has been dismissed and appeals have been denied, it is unlikely to have a direct impact at this time.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
Back
Top