Freezing @ 500 degrees centigrade

  • Thread starter Thread starter miss photon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degrees Freezing
AI Thread Summary
At high altitudes in the thermosphere, temperatures can reach up to 500 degrees Celsius, yet an animal would freeze due to the near vacuum conditions that limit heat transfer. The sparse gas molecules are insufficient for effective heat conduction or convection, leading to a significant temperature discrepancy when measured by a thermometer, which would read well below freezing. The temperature increase with altitude is attributed to the absorption of solar radiation by residual oxygen, but this does not translate to warmth for living organisms. At night, radiative cooling would cause rapid heat loss, contributing to the freezing conditions. Overall, the unique atmospheric conditions in the thermosphere create a paradox where high temperatures do not equate to warmth for animals.
miss photon
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
i found this in a textbook.
at a high altitude the temperature of the atmosphere is 500 degrees centigrade. yet an animal there would freeze to death and not boil. why does this happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a reference for this? That region of the atmosphere is called the "thermosphere", but I don't see why an animal would freeze there. By then you are basically in space, and what happens in space is a lot more complicated than saying you'd "freeze to death" (you'd suffocate first...).
 
I suppose that although the temperature of the few gas molecules flying around might be 500deg - you are facing a lot of solid angle of 3K space, so radiatively you woul dget pretty cold pretty quickly.
 
wik said:
The few particles of gas in this area can reach 2,500°C (4500°F) during the day. Even though the temperature is so high, one would not feel warm in the thermosphere, because it is so near vacuum that there is not enough contact with the few atoms of gas to transfer much heat. A normal thermometer would read significantly below 0°C.
That doesn't make any sense to me. You get cold by transferring heat, so while it is true that there is not enough air to gain heat by convection, you can't lose heat by convection either. So how do you (or that thermometer) get cold? Radiation? Well...
wik said:
temperatures increase with altitude due to absorption of highly energetic solar radiation by the small amount of residual oxygen still present. Temperatures are highly dependent on solar activity, and can rise to 2,000°C.
If the air gets hot by absorbing solar radiation, why wouldn't you? At night, though, you would certainly get cold by radiating heat (though we calculated that once here and found that you could stand it for quite a while - probably indefinitely with a little insulation).

A thermometer doesn't generate its own heat, but we do.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top