Frequency Multiplier problem for a guitar tuner

  • Thread starter Thread starter steveyesterda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Guitar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on designing a guitar tuner circuit that utilizes a microphone, low-pass filters, and a crystal oscillator at 32,768 Hz to convert string frequencies into square waves. The primary challenge is achieving a frequency measurement accuracy of two decimal places, as the current setup only provides a resolution of 1 Hz. The user is exploring the use of a phase-locked loop (PLL) for frequency multiplication but requires guidance on the necessary components. Suggestions include using a higher-frequency crystal or researching existing frequency counter schematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electronic circuit design
  • Familiarity with phase-locked loops (PLLs)
  • Knowledge of frequency counters and their operation
  • Experience with low-pass filters and signal processing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research PLL design and component selection for frequency multiplication
  • Explore higher-frequency crystal oscillators for improved time-base accuracy
  • Investigate existing frequency counter schematics for enhanced measurement techniques
  • Learn about signal sampling methods to improve frequency resolution
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electronics hobbyists, and engineers designing audio equipment or guitar tuners seeking to improve frequency measurement accuracy.

steveyesterda
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello everyone

I am a physics student who is currently writing his dissertation on designing a guitar tuner.
So far I have designed my circuit to have a microphone that inputs the sound played from the string. Then a 6 way switch connected to low-pass filters filters out the unwanted higher harmonics. I have used a crystal oscillator at 32768Hz and divide it down to give me my 1 second pulse and used a commparator to change my input string frequency to a square wave.

The problem I am having is with the +/-1 count ambiguity of a frequency counter of this style. Currently, if I were to count that signal I would only be able to determine the unknown frequency to 1Hz, not accurate enough for a guitar tuner. I need to be counting to 2 decimal places, so my plan was to multiply this frequency by 100, but this is where I become stuck.

I have tried researching using a PLL (phase-locked loop) but I don't really understand which components and values I need to get this to work. Can someone please help me. :(

Or if anyone knows of an IC that would do this job for me, that would be even better! I have looked at this frequency multiplier
http://parts.digikey.com/1/parts/1174449-ic-pll-freq-multiplier-28-tssop-sn65lvds150pwr.html
but i don't know if that will give me the desired multiplication or if it i would need to add any other components to make this work.

Thanks PhysicsForum, any help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1hz sensitivity is enough, I think.
commertial tuners are sensitive to about 0.5 hz.
1 hz is fair for an amateur design.
 
hey, thanks for your reply.

Problem is, i have stated already that the human ear can tell the difference in frequency of about 5cents which on the low E string of a guitar corresponds to about 1/4Hz, an accuracy I need to be able to replicate.

Is there not a simple way to just increase the frequency x10 twice?

Thanks
 
steveyesterda, cool project.

It sounds like you're on the right track.

Of course, you could get to 1/4 Hz accuracy by triggering on the up and down portions of the square wave then sampling for 2 seconds, but I suppose you want even better than 1/4 Hz (plus faster sampling). PLL sounds like the way to go, I don't know component specifics, but there's got to be sample frequency counter (essentially what you're building) schematics out there. Best of luck, steveyesterda.
 
Rather than use a PLL (and being completely ignorant of your design) can you just use a higher-frequency crystal for your time-base? Even the internal oscillator of most microcontrollers can be calibrated fairly well, assuming fairly consistent voltage, and temperature.

EDIT: And welcome to PhysicsForums!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K