B Frequnncy and 1/t, I don't really understand

AI Thread Summary
Frequency is defined as the number of cycles per unit time, expressed mathematically as f = 1/t. Given a period t of 20 seconds, the frequency f calculates to 0.05 Hz. The relationship between frequency and period indicates that the product of frequency and period (ft) equals one. This means that for a frequency of 0.05 Hz and a period of 20 seconds, the number of cycles is indeed one. Clarifying that frequency is the reciprocal of the period helps in understanding these concepts more clearly.
SsagatroNN
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
if freqeuncy is 1/t then if i was given t, then f is the reciprocal of t right?
f=1/t
t=20s
f=1/20
f=0.05Hz right?
another thing,
if 1 is the number of cycles per second, isn't it also a variable?
so if i know the freqeuncy which is 0.05 Hz, and the T is 20s, then the number of cycles is
0.05*20=1
this confuses me,
does this always happen, is the number of cycles multipliedd by the freuqeuncy always one ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Frequency", ##f##, is the number of cycles per unit time (normally one second).

"Time", ##t##, in this context is the time for each cycle.

So, by definition: ##t = 1/f; f = 1/t; ft = 1##
 
It's perhaps less confusing to say that frequency is one over the period, where the period is the time taken for one cycle of whatever it is that's oscillating. "Time", in my mind, is a much more general concept (12 o'clock is a time, but one over 12 o'clock makes no sense), so I find the statement "frequency is one over time" to be difficult to pin down. Using "period" instead helps me keep concepts straight.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale, DrClaude and PeroK
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top