Friction and Relation of Coefficient of Friction to Smoothness

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the coefficient of friction and the smoothness of surfaces, particularly focusing on how increasing smoothness can lead to unexpected increases in the coefficient of friction. Participants explore various theories and examples related to this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while increasing smoothness generally decreases the coefficient of friction, there is a threshold beyond which further smoothing increases the coefficient, citing observations from Japanese scientists.
  • Another participant suggests that the total contact surface area plays a role, proposing that less smooth surfaces may have less total contact area, thus reducing friction.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes the importance of the number of particles per unit area and the effects of Van der Waals forces, illustrated by the example of polished glass plates sticking together.
  • One participant introduces the concept of optical contact bonding, stating that very clean surfaces can bond without glue or heat, implying a connection to frictional properties.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms behind the relationship between surface smoothness and friction, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing theories presented.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the definitions of "smoothness" and the specific conditions under which the coefficient of friction changes are not fully explored, leaving room for further investigation.

eagermind
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Friction and Relation of Coefficient of Friction to "Smoothness"

In my physics class today my teacher began discussing a very peculiar characteristic concerning the static and dynamic coefficients of friction. Apparently, when one makes an object's surface "smoother" (meaning with less impurities and a more uniform surface), the coefficient decreases to a certain point. However, past that point of "smoothness," the smoother the object becomes, the greater the coefficient of friction becomes. Apparently Japanese scientists have machines for this purpose unlike anywhere else in the world that make the surface of an object look uniform, even to a scanning electron microscope, and yet have a quite high coefficient of friction.

My teacher said that there were several theories as to why this strange phenomenon occurred, such as a theory that the uniformity of the object's surface creates a uniform electron spin that interferes with the spin of another object placed upon it. However, others say that this and other theories don't hold any water.

If anyone has any examples or other theories that explain why this weird and surprising (to me) quirk appears, I would appreciate your input. This is my first post, so I hope you all can cut me some slack.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi! :D Welcome! I'm new to this forum too haha.

Just making a guess :P, maybe its because of the total contact surface area. When the surface is not too smooth, the contact surface is not 100% as some molecules will be higher while some will be lower which won't come in contact with the object. Friction is related to its contact surface. We know that when friction happens, the objects tend to "rub" off some tiny particles from the surface. So it would be better if the contact surface is not 100% smooth so object won't have so much contact with the suface cause if its smooth it will fit the surface so perfectly that it will have to "rub" off the whole surface haha :)
 


Hi, it is not just the surface area but the number of particles per unit area that are in close proximity. When particles are close to each other, Van der Waals forces arise between them. To check this yourself try putting together two polished glass plates (e.g. microscope slides) and lifting the upper one. The lower one seems to stick to the upper one. This is also how insects, geckos etc. stick say to vertical surfaces. Adhesion and friction are related properties.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
6K